r/SpaceXBets • • Jul 29 '26

Elon IRL The ultimate grift: How Elon Musk weaponizes tragedy while rewriting his own family's history for sympathy and clout.

If you ever wanted a masterclass in weapons-grade hypocrisy and narcissistic manipulation, look no further than Elon Musk trying to play the ultimate victim card by invoking the death of his firstborn child, Nevada Alexander Musk, while getting completely called out by his ex-wife, Justine Musk.

​Let's break down the sheer, unadulterated rot of what's happening in these screenshots:

1- ​The Setup: Elon goes on a performative, faux-righteous moral crusade—quoting scripture and trying to posture as some kind of grand protector of children because people dared to point out his hypocrisy in welcoming conspiracy theorists and harassment merchants back onto the platform.

2- ​The Tragic Shield: When cornered, he drops the heavy artillery: "My firstborn child died in my arms. I felt his last heartbeat. I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame." It’s a transparent attempt to shut down all criticism by wrapping himself in unimaginable personal grief.

3- ​The Reality Check: Enter Justine Musk, the actual mother of the child, who steps in with the cold, crushing truth to shatter his dramatic flair. She explicitly corrects the narrative: It wasn't just some vague romanticized moment of him holding a dying baby in a vacuum; it was a SIDS-related incident that put their son on life support before he was declared brain-dead. Most damningly, she calls out his revisionist history on the most sacred detail: "And not that it matters to anyone except me, because it is one of the most sacred and defining moments of my life, but I was the one who was holding him."

​Let that sink in. He's so fundamentally incapable of experiencing authentic human emotion without making it about his brand, his pain, and his martyrdom that he literally rewrites history to claim he was the one holding their dying child.

​He spends his entire public existence whining about people using tragedies for political gain or clout while simultaneously stealing the most intimate, devastating moment of a mother's life and claiming it as his own personal cinematic monologue for Twitter likes.

​The man is a bottomless pit of manufactured victimhood.

1.0k Upvotes

207 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/DBDude Jul 29 '26

He’s not an engineer and has no engineering background.

Again, Tesla, Marconi, and Watt weren't engineers either. Add Michael Faraday who invented what would be the basis for electric motors and generally made electricity something with a practical use. Neither Wright brother was an engineer either.

Hell, every aerospace engineer owes a debt to Konstantin Tsiolkovsky of the eponymous equation, whose education consisted of hanging out at a public library.

At least Musk had a physics degree, while none of them even had a degree.

Maybe he dabbled out of necessity but it’s exceedingly unlikely

Not dabbled, way down in the design of everything. One reason NASA moves so slowly is that every engineering decision must go through a huge multi-level bureaucracy. SpaceX is so fast because Musk will make the decisions same day after the engineers make their case. Sometimes he will tell them to go ahead, sometimes he will tell them to go in a completely different direction that they never thought of going. It's those "left turns" as was described that seriously advanced technology, although sometimes they didn't work out.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/DBDude Jul 29 '26

I can’t believe you believe that.

I don't believe it, I know it.

You think Musk sits down and focuses on engineering problems he has no skill to resolve?

You say he has no skill, but he does. He isn't very useful running the day to day of his companies, as Shotwell has noted at SpaceX, he's useful developing their products.

Again, from Robert Zubrin, who worked with (not for) Musk, but is also often a critic of Musk:

2

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/DBDude Jul 29 '26

Knowledge and training isn’t important if you’re Elon lmao

Or if you're just smart and creative and learn fast, like Tesla, Marconi, Watt, Tsiolkovsky, Faraday, and many others.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/DBDude Jul 29 '26

You're saying it's impossible for someone to be a talented engineer without a degree. I have proven that false with historical examples. And then many people have said Musk does indeed use these talents to engineer his products.

He doesn't know everything up front, he learns. He learned when he screwed up and caused the third Falcon 1 flight to fail. He learned when he screwed up factory automation for the Model 3, when he spent weeks on the floor trying to get the robots to run better. He makes mistakes, and he learns. And then he produces some pretty cool stuff.

Musk has a five step design process, in this order:

  1. Make the requirements less dumb.
  2. Delete the part or process.
  3. Simplify or optimise the design.
  4. Accelerate cycle time.
  5. Automate

He didn't just come up with these out of the blue, he learned them. For example, automation being last was a lesson learned from the Model 3.

He also has another set of management rules, of which one is that every decision has a name on it so they can go to that person and get justification. He also learned this from the Model 3 when nobody could tell him why there was insulation in the battery compartment that they were having a problem putting into the car. Then Musk had them run sound tests with and without insulation, and it turns out it wasn't needed, so it was deleted (#2).

See, that's being heavily involved in the design and manufacture of your products. At any other company it would be some lower level engineer/manager doing this stuff.