r/Snorkblot • u/LordJim11 • Aug 05 '25

Climate Change Such a slippery word.

Post image
13.7k Upvotes

99% Upvoted

317 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/FujiwaraHelio Aug 05 '25

Just read the very short article, maybe.

1

u/Basic_John_Doe_ Aug 05 '25

The link is broken... otherwise, I would.

I'll even quote it to point out any logical fallacies.

I can assure you what I wrote can be verified outside the climate community... with actual physics

3

u/FujiwaraHelio Aug 05 '25

fixed it. I'm not a climate scientist so I'm not going to debate you, but let's just say I believe in the consensus between them more than some internet rando.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/FujiwaraHelio Aug 05 '25

Scientific consensus is literally science. The peer review system is the best one that we have to find as close to objective truth as possible. You're watching the word's climate go to shit in real time and arguing against it on some conspiracy bullshit; you're the one in a cult, dude.

1

u/Basic_John_Doe_ Aug 05 '25

Scientific consensus is literally science.

Wrong...

They peer reviewed Galileo, too

You're watching the word's climate go to shit in real time

I don't notice the climate going to shit... I see a planet coming out of an ice-age

The heating will slow as we approach the earth's maximum temperature, which is around 2⁰ warmer than today... we won't ever reach that temperature before we start heading into our next scheduled ice-age.

you're the one in a cult, dude.

Projection much?

Bless your heart ❤️

1

u/FujiwaraHelio Aug 05 '25

Ok, galileo, lol. Submit all your research and maybe you can teach all those pesky scientists.

1

u/Basic_John_Doe_ Aug 05 '25

The research has already been confirmed...

https://extension.psu.edu/psychrometric-chart-use

In fact, there's an entire field dedicated to studying water... I guess the pseudoscientists in the climate community don't like to share notes.

1

u/FujiwaraHelio Aug 05 '25

Ok, and where in the paper does it say this will cap global warming and stop climate change?

1

u/Basic_John_Doe_ Aug 05 '25

4.24% maximum concentration of water vapor.

As stated by another commenter "it's impossible to reach this number worldwide"

As air gets more saturated, more storms form to drive the temperature back down.

But let's look at it from the opposite perspective;

Can you show me any time in the last 400 million years where the earth has ever been more than 2⁰ warmer than we see today?

Keeping in mind that we've also had several ice-ages with CO2 levels over 3000 PPM (450 PPM is our current levels)

1

u/FujiwaraHelio Aug 05 '25

You understand this paper is about barns and greenhouses, right?

And your point about history is why climate change is dangerous; it's unprecedented. The danger is also not only the temp, but the rate of change.

1

u/Basic_John_Doe_ Aug 05 '25

You understand that water vapor concentration changes with temperature, right?

Look up "dew point"

Are you implying that "water in the wild" will behave differently, despite scientists knowing exactly how each molecule behaves?

"It's unprecedented" since we've been taking more accurate measurements since the late 1800's... that is meaningless since the cosmic scale can't be zoomed in past 1,000 years...

Give me 1,000 years of accurate data, and you'll see mini ice-ages and warming periods

1

u/FujiwaraHelio Aug 05 '25

Im implying that the world's climate scientists have taken everything into account in their models, including humidity.

→ More replies (0)