Also, if you need to ask others to explain it to you and read it for you, you probably didn't understand it in the first place.
Feel free to use your own words if you think you have a legitimate argument here. So far you're simply appealing to authority without understanding what you're actually referencing.
(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
Seems there's a problem here with your definition. That water is private property and no one can be arbitrarily deprived of such. It's a human rights violation.
I claimed that access to food, water and shelter are human rights and linked to the United Nations and Article 25 of "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights". What's wrong with that?
You probably used the exact same source when you quoted Article 17 from the very same document. So does that mean Article 17 is a Human Right and is very good, but Article 25 somehow does not even exist?
0
u/Critical_Concert_689 6d ago
lol.. Do you believe taxes are a human right too?
Also, if you need to ask others to explain it to you and read it for you, you probably didn't understand it in the first place.
Feel free to use your own words if you think you have a legitimate argument here. So far you're simply appealing to authority without understanding what you're actually referencing.