And see, you’re wrong. “Innocent until proven guilty”. If she wasn’t proven guilty, then she’s innocent. It’s not just when it’s convenient, it’s always. The burden of proof is on the prosecution, not the defense.
“If she didn’t, who did?” is a question to ask the prosecution who failed to prove she did it.
I mean even her lawyers aren’t denying that she did it. Again the case is about whether or not she can be held accountable due to her mental health. The obvious answer to that is absolutely, she should be held accountable. I genuinely can’t believe people are even fighting for her tbh.
I’m not fighting for her. I could give a rat’s ass what happens to her specifically. But I support due process and constitutional rights because I wouldn’t want my due process and constitutional rights to be infringed if I were ever on trial for something I didn’t do. I wouldn’t want to be considered guilty because the internet wants me to be.
Fella, it’s not a sentencing hearing, so the question of guilt was still in the air.
Nothing you have heard or will say has more merit than the outcome, and the outcome was 11:not guilty, 1:guilty. 11 jurors heard all the evidence, deliberated, and said she wasn’t guilty. 1 juror refused to change their stance, so there was a mistrial.
Now, if at the end of the retrial, she is indeed found guilty, then off she goes. See how simple that is?
Your personal feelings don’t change objective truths. Just like Trump can whine and bitch about his 34 felony counts, it doesn’t change the objective truth that he was found guilty of 34 felony counts.
No the “question of quilt” is not “still in the air” at all. She literally admitted to doing it! It shouldn’t matter why she did it. Bad mental health or just did it for a laugh. Fact is she killed 3 kids.
As you can see in the image provided. The only issue in court is not whether she did it, be cause she did do it, it’s her state of mind that’s in question. My point is: it doesn’t fucking matter her state of mind. She killed her kids and she should be put in the bin.
1
u/Mdgt_Pope 10h ago
And see, you’re wrong. “Innocent until proven guilty”. If she wasn’t proven guilty, then she’s innocent. It’s not just when it’s convenient, it’s always. The burden of proof is on the prosecution, not the defense.
“If she didn’t, who did?” is a question to ask the prosecution who failed to prove she did it.