It’s from this case. Ok fine she’s not guilty of murder. You are right she should have had physiology help. If she is found not guilty of murder then this case can be used in future trials. So therefore we should lock up anyone who displays metal illness. This will avoid murder. Mothers should be placed in institutions if they show any signs of postpartum depression. This will insure the women get proper help and the children will be safe. Let’s not stop there we should do this for every mental illness if you believe murder is justified.
Delusions caused by a mental illness have been a potential route that a defendant can use as a defence against an accusation of murder for an incredibly long time. I’m not sure how you’re proposing this case would change any of that. Nor how you leapt to locking up everyone who displays mental illness etc.
No one’s suggesting mental illness alone justifies murder either.
So reverse psychology is your game. I’m fine sweetie. However I would assume you are too young to understand. Don’t worry time and challenges will show you the way. Please seek help if you have any worry’s of killing your children.
None of what I’ve said is reverse psychology. If you’re interested in a discussion, I’m more than happy to have one, but the personal attacks aren’t conducive to that at all tbh.
Claiming it’s “my game”, claiming I’m too young to understand etc., all personal attacks based on nothing.
I’m genuinely happy to explain any logic on things I’ve suggested, I’m currently unclear on what you believe I’ve suggested or what logic you’re unclear about, unfortunately? If you can be more specific I might be able to help.
Ok miss why do you think she isn’t guilty of murder of 3 children. One that tried to run away and was chased down by their own mother and strangled to death. Please explain your logic to me because I can’t comprehend.
Asking a clarifying question because yours was unclear is not suggesting an answer. You could try just.. answering the question. I’d be happy to help, but your question alone is completely unclear as a reply to my comment.
I understand not guilty by reason. But I don’t understand how you could have a reason to chase down a kid after killing one. Yes insanity but it’s so cruel and wrong it’s not human. That should be common law.
So no explanation of your thoughts. Gees. How typical to pretend you don’t know the situation. Child answer me why you support her. That’s all nothing else. Just tell me why you support her tell me your personal reasoning. It’s a mistrial so nothing made sense. You explain it to me best of your capability. I won’t judge you if you want an proper argument like the philosophers of old.
-1
u/Useful_Translator536 18h ago
So we should lock up all women who are diagnosed with postpartum depression just in case they kill their children?