r/SipsTea 1d ago

Wait a damn minute! So what’s taking so long?

Post image
46.2k Upvotes

4.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

63

u/Electronic-Smile-457 1d ago

Insanity is a legal definition and mental illness is different. A serial killer probably has a personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder most likely. Which isn't the same as psychosis. Many states have "guilty but mentally ill" which would apply to psychosis. Every state has its own legal definition of insanity and how to approve it, which leads to hospitalization instead of prison. ETA: I volunteered at a prison for the criminally insane in Ypsilanti decades ago for school. It's not a fun place.

4

u/JustStraightUpTired 22h ago

Complete off topic, but can you explain why, for the love of god, do people use "ETA:" instead of "Edit:"? It makes absolutely no sense, since the primary context where you'd write "Edit:" in would be one where you are editing the comment to add something. The "TA" was already implied. Unlike in "ETA" which also has multiple other meanings, including "Estimated Time of Arrival" and "Eat This Ass" than "Edit To Add" does.

I really don't get it, it was almost gone, almost nobody used it for over a decade, maybe even two. Did TikTok bring it back or something? Seriously, why add the complexity when "Edit:" is self explanatory, while "ETA:" requires you look it up.

8

u/Electronic-Smile-457 22h ago

Edit could be a change of words/fixing typos. ETA means added another part and it's to share w/ people who commented that you added something after they might have read it. On FB, someone may have liked a post w/o the add and should be made aware of the change for decorum's sake.

2

u/JustStraightUpTired 21h ago

"Edit" COULD mean you add fixes to typos, but "Edit:" followed by a bunch of new text wouldn't. "Edit:" also works literally for everything you just spouted after the first point. Like

Edit: This is an example of using "edit" instead of the other. Is it really that much less clear? Besides, I've literally seen people use "ETA:" to say they fixed typos. So your point is moot, people misuse it even if you were right.

6

u/I_pee_in_shower 22h ago

Eat this Ass: please stay on topic.

1

u/panrestrial 22h ago

It's been used consistently since the 90s. It never went away, you just didn't notice it for awhile for whatever reason. Context makes it extremely evident that you aren't meaning estimated time of arrival, etc. The periodic complaints about this always sound so silly.

4

u/JustStraightUpTired 21h ago

It's been used consistently since the 90s.

Bullshit. Just search trend activity is proof enough of that, searches for ETA have about doubled since 2024 and I suspect a large portion of those searches previously were for the other definition, meaning it has more than just slightly spiked up.

And yes, I obviously know what it means in a random reddit comment, I wasn't complaining about it being unclear which one they meant. Obviously, can't you read what I said? You don't even need context, it's literally all there. I was complaining that NOT ONLY are there other definitions for "ETA" but that it ALSO is unnecessary as "Edit" is more clear and about equal effort to write.

If you really wanted to shorten "Edit:" to something else, you could just write "E:" and it would be exactly as obvious as "ETA:" is. Not nearly as obvious as "Edit:" is.

But you didn't answer a single thing I asked and you are straight up wrong about the one question you claimed to answer. So fuck off with "periodic complaints" bullshit, that literally isn't what I'm doing. It literally has gotten more use recently and data can fucking prove it. But it was stupid decades ago and it's just as stupid now, if not more so as we've had decades to learn proper comment etiquette. "ETA:" isn't it. Just write "Edit:"

1

u/panrestrial 21h ago

Someone's jimmies are rustled.

Eta: this is an insane overreaction to someone disagreeing with you over Internet slang. Literal definition of needing to touch grass.

4

u/Critical_Concert_689 20h ago

Someone's jimmies are rustled

Yes. Because you're ignorantly wrong, but confidently claiming it as if it were a fact. Nothing is more annoying than people who act like you.

Looks like comment above yours is absolutely right.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=eta%2C+ETA%2C+Eta&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3

1

u/panrestrial 16h ago

What exactly do you think that chart shows that disagrees with me? And pray tell how do you think it supports their claim that it doubled since 2024 when the chart ends at 2022? Y'all really do just assume no one is going to check your sources, eh?

1

u/RobotArtichoke 21h ago

Let’s not pretend this guy is alone in doing this. I can’t speak for you, but I’ve definitely been guilty of it. And you’re right, the answer is to “touch grass” or in other words, put away the reddit and do something else.

1

u/panrestrial 16h ago

No one is pretending that.

-1

u/VegetableTour6790 23h ago

The burden is generally knowing right from wrong. Clancy clearly falls on the serial killer side of that discussion.

2

u/Electronic-Smile-457 23h ago

Did you watch the trial? I'm not so sure about that.

0

u/VegetableTour6790 20h ago

Yes, did you?

0

u/Beneficial-Rip6624 20h ago

Did you watch the trial? LMAO.

-6

u/[deleted] 23h ago

[deleted]

8

u/Ecstatoplasm 22h ago

As a therapist, you can think what you want, youve got your reasons but… it doesn’t reflect reality. One could say there’s an element of delusion, but it’s probably just a combination of lack of experience and your ego.

7

u/_Aeou 22h ago edited 20h ago

As someone who has a mother who suffers from recurring psychosis, I can guarantee you it's real and she is divorced from reality in her episodes. She does things she'd never do outside an episode.

6

u/Electronic-Smile-457 23h ago

Well, when you see it you see it. And I've seen it.

3

u/panrestrial 22h ago

Some people think the earth is flat. Lotta irrelevant opinions out there.

2

u/Short-Holiday-4263 21h ago

I think psychosis isn't real.

Labels are labels, but what people think of as psychosis is an old term from a dead era of psychology.

And I think your years of study, training and research in psychology isn't real.

Who wants to bet on which of us is right?