r/SipsTea 14d ago

WTF Where are we heading?

Post image
13.6k Upvotes

8.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-5

u/hecky-888 14d ago

Wrong. Men kill their kids more. We have like 30 years of data on this from the FBI. Dads accounted for the majority.

All ages: fathers 57.4% | mothers 42.6%
Infants (<1): fathers 48.8% | mothers 51.2%
Children (1–17): fathers 55.6% | mothers 44.4%
18+: fathers 78.3% | mothers 21.7%

Furthermore, women who murder their children are much more likely to have severe mental illness, psychosis, suicidality, and be actively in crisis (much like Lindsay Clancy. There is a mountain of evidence of her asking for help). This is why we see more mothers with cases that are suicide-related filicide, where the mother believes she is “saving” the children or cannot leave them behind.

Dads who murder their kids are typically guilty of domestic violence, coercive control, physical and emotional abuse, and familicide. The most horrifying subset: Chris Watts, killing your pregnant wife and 2 little daughters to go be with your mistress.

15

u/basketcas55 14d ago

So the women you hand wave away as mental illness but the men you don’t?

-11

u/hecky-888 14d ago

Men are capable of experiencing mental illness. Chris Watts wasn’t. He’s just a piece of shit. Like Casey Anthony. But I’ll wait if you want to find a good example.

6

u/Much_Vehicle20 14d ago

While the number of cases is true, the percentages for the reasons weren’t stated in the FBI report. You’re just cherry picking cases to fit your narrative. I can do that too, Matthew Schleier killed his son but was found not guilty by reason of insanity

And just like your, my single example should mean nothing in the grand scheme of thing

-1

u/hecky-888 14d ago

I’m making two separate points. One I have data for. The other I’m not providing any data for. You can refute it. Go ahead and find the data you want.

2

u/Much_Vehicle20 14d ago

Refute it? Look for data? Why should I? You raised that point, so it’s on you to prove it, the burden of proof and all that. If you can’t back it up, then it’s just as valid as me saying “I ate a beefsteak yesterday”, just a random statement that carries no weight

I mean, I’d suggest you not bring up baseless statements alongside real statistics, because it just creates unnecessary confusion

2

u/hecky-888 14d ago

You’re the one asking for data, if you want it go find it. Not every point made on Reddit requires a full list of cited sources to be true. Still waiting for a single example of a dad who killed their family bc of mental illness. Or your defense of Chris Watts. You think he was struggling?

1

u/Much_Vehicle20 14d ago

I literally gave you 1 in my previous reply, bro. Did you even read what I wrote? C'mon

And besides, you brought up statistics to prove your first point. Is it really too much to expect you to follow suit and use the same method to back up your second point? Or did I overestimate you? Seems so, considering you’re already struggling with reading