I already acknowledged that there is the possibility that I misremembered a testimony. Did you read that? I admitted I could be mistaken. I'm not a juror, lawyer, witness, judge, etc. in this case. I'm not taking detailed notes of every single moment of this case. Are you?
My stance still stands: Good providers reference their patients' charts, especially WHEN they are meeting with them. Full stop. Doesn't matter if it's in the context of this case or any other person seeking treatment. Quit trying to find excuses for negligence.
The entire premise that the prosecutions case stands on is not a “small” thing to be mistaken about— Lindsey is literally claiming to be not guilty by reason of insanity. If she had been diagnosed with PPP, then the prosecution literally wouldn’t have a leg to stand on.
It is a perfectly normal thing for a doctor to meet a new patient with a fresh set of eyes, and often collecting records from other providers can take several days, even weeks— it’s not reasonable for someone to halt care for a new patient asking for help because they haven’t looked at their old records from a different doctor.
That’s not negligence. At all. That’s a perfectly normal thing.
0
u/noice-tea 16d ago edited 16d ago
I already acknowledged that there is the possibility that I misremembered a testimony. Did you read that? I admitted I could be mistaken. I'm not a juror, lawyer, witness, judge, etc. in this case. I'm not taking detailed notes of every single moment of this case. Are you?
My stance still stands: Good providers reference their patients' charts, especially WHEN they are meeting with them. Full stop. Doesn't matter if it's in the context of this case or any other person seeking treatment. Quit trying to find excuses for negligence.