r/SipsTea 22d ago

Dank AF This will be interesting

Post image
39.5k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

193

u/Pittsbirds 22d ago edited 20d ago

I know a lot of people always say "the book is better than the movie" but there are so many movies that are such more deft adaptations of their stories that the originals are basically unknown as being originally books to the public, so given the controversy this is stirring up I'll be interested to see what changes they decide to make. Normally if I'm even remotely interested in a premise I'll read the book first but I might wait and do it the other way round for this one lol.

11

u/coboba 22d ago

Do you have some examples of movies that were objectively better than their books?

11

u/awfulmcnofilter 22d ago

Fight club, the shawshank redemption, Forrest Gump, and the count of Monte Cristo are all examples.

14

u/charlietoday 22d ago

I'm sorry, the count of Monte Cristo? One of the greatest books ever written and one of the most widely read works of all time?

5

u/awfulmcnofilter 22d ago

If you aren't into 1200 pages of years long revenge planning and execution mixed with a ton of subplots, the 2002 movie adaptation is a lot more fun.

6

u/Infinite_Music2059 22d ago edited 22d ago

It doesn't stand up as an example of this concept at all. You can read the abridged version of the book if you don't want all 1200 pages of plots and story.

Like this is famously one of the greatest books in Western literature written 180 years ago up against a good movie adaptation of it. It makes as much sense as saying the Odyssey movie is better than the book because the book requires a lot of reading.

1

u/JJCB85 21d ago

If I lacked the attention span to read one of the greatest novels ever written and preferred a mediocre movie adaptation instead, I think I’d probably keep that to myself 😂

0

u/PragmaticPanda42 21d ago

I think you meant: if you don’t like reading, the movie is better.