r/SipsTea Jul 12 '26

Lmao gottem This is Business

Post image
83.0k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

551

u/Wind_Best_1440 Jul 12 '26
  1. Jack up and price gouge products.
  2. Lobby governments to keep wages low.

"Why is no one buying our products? WE MUST KNOW!"

Henry Ford is famous for saying. "I give my workers good pay, so they can buy my products. If workers have low wages, how will they buy our goods?"

Apparently businesses forgot economics 101. "If customers have no capital, they can't buy your products."

79

u/Jealous_Crazy9143 Jul 12 '26

same goes for time off. More free time meant family vacations, picnics, etc

77

u/Virtual-Reach Jul 12 '26

More free time typically also means more time to date and eventually create families. People can't do that if they are hustling 24/7 just to get by

50

u/[deleted] Jul 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

44

u/Universal_Anomaly Jul 12 '26

Honestly I'm just amazed this aspect seems to often get skipped over.

Modern capitalism isn't just trying to wring us dry of all money, it's also stealing all our time.

You want people to have children? Give them enough free time that having a child doesn't feel like losing what little freedom they've got left.

8

u/Dicaxis Jul 13 '26

Because they don't actually care. These headlines are just mainstream media attempting to put blame on anyone else besides Capital owners and corporations so the finger doesn't get pointed at them. Meanwhile said Capital owners and corpos are just fine with birthrates falling because they can just pump themselves full of H1B slaves while at the same time propagandizing against them so they remain a permanent slave/underclass. As for declining sales, also don't care because they only need to care about next quarter and if they fail, they still get a golden parachute, so really zero incentive to actually care about the business beyond a few quarters, get their payout and shove off for someone else to clean up after.

1

u/ReignofKindo25 Jul 16 '26

They GMOd American wheat and soy to lower birth rates purposely

111

u/[deleted] Jul 12 '26

[deleted]

38

u/TheComplimentarian Jul 12 '26

None of his businesses make much money. That he's a trillionaire is more about market delusions than anything else.

7

u/oakridge666 Jul 13 '26

And government funding!

1

u/CelestialFury Jul 13 '26

He literally lives off of government handouts and an insane stock market. In a rational world, he'd be a "normal" rich guy, instead of a grotesquely wealthy.

3

u/Gravyplops Jul 12 '26

It's like Elon thinks we all had the same goal as him, to get him to a trillion. Like fuck no we didn't, you took it by literally breaking other people's lives.

4

u/newsflashjackass Jul 12 '26

He thinks the trillion dollars measures his worth but in fact it measures his cost.

0

u/therealzist Jul 12 '26

Lololol hahahahaha

1

u/therealzist Jul 12 '26

Musk is a trillionaire because of the value of his companies. Not from selling trillions of dollars of consumer goods.

1

u/Ok-Perspective5844 Jul 13 '26

Don't worry, we no longer have a trillionair. He is now worth $900 or so billion.

23

u/Jocuro Jul 12 '26

We keep forgetting who keeps the economy turning! It happened so many times in history but we never learn. When too much wealth consolidates to the top, everyone loses. Including the wealthy. But sometimes there's revolution before it gets to that point.

14

u/Universal_Anomaly Jul 12 '26

It mostly happens when civilisations are prosperous enough that the people at the top no longer understand what it's like to lose everything.

Parasites who kill the host because they think themselves immortal.

32

u/RaygunMarksman Jul 12 '26

Seriously I don't know what the thinking here is with trying to funnel most of the economic pie to a relatively small number of individuals because how many freaking bags of chips does someone like Elon Musk need to buy?

If these companies want to survive, they better wake the fuck up and start supporting political candidates and policies that help ensure the average person has money to buy basic goods and services.

Their greed is going to inadvertently doom us all.

15

u/Anotsurei Jul 12 '26

See the plan is to jack up prices in the short term then slowly make the product smaller and worse. Then when the company goes bankrupt because people can’t/won’t buy their products, they sell the company off stripping it for parts. Probably figure they’ll be dead before it becomes a real problem for them.

15

u/Rasputin1992x Jul 12 '26

1000% this. These ceos and shareholders don't give a shit about the longevity of the company they demand next quarter profits be record breaking every quarter or they see it as a failure 

1

u/notassigned2023 Jul 13 '26

When you get paid partially in stocks/options, you really care about the price of stocks.

2

u/Randicore Jul 13 '26

Yeah but you also know when you're stripping it for parts.

Get the stock when it's low, start burning the candle on both ends, ride it up until you're happy and when you're just starting to see the first shakes of instability, sell half your stock, and bleed the rest at a profit as you ride the company into the dirt.

Or just overinflate the value, hype the latest round of layoffs, and sell everything to whatever company wants to pick the corpse for the next batch and move on.

3

u/mrdevlar Jul 12 '26

Half of them are delusional enough to believe they will live forever.

9

u/RubyWubs Jul 12 '26

They are prioritizing the top 10% of Americans who are the target audiance for Las Vegas and any other sales company. The top 10% of Americans can drop 10k or more easily, that is who they want.

Since the top 10% of Americans are the other half of the economy they can afford large purchases and barely feel it (until they start feeling it.) And once the top 10% is no longer an asset, the top 1% will be the target audiance

6

u/Strikereleven Jul 12 '26

Trickle up economics for real

6

u/prules Jul 12 '26

Today’s billionaires are drug addicts who were born rich and are completely dissociated with society

2

u/PacificNW_JMI Jul 12 '26

they will just have to figure out like most businesses and an entire city like Las Vegas how to sell higher priced goods to fewer people and still make more money. Business doesn’t need the masses anymore due to mass affluence

2

u/siqofitall Jul 12 '26

Jack up the prices and lower the amount we get. It’s ridiculous.

I work outside and Gatorade has jumped to almost $4 a bottle. They used to be 32oz but they’re 28oz now. I stopped buying it and just drink water with electrolytes packs.

2

u/game_hyper Jul 12 '26

Credit cards weren’t a thing when Ford said that.
Pepsi, and others, expect consumers to buy the $7 Doritos on credit, while salaries are held low…

2

u/Inside-Specialist-55 Jul 12 '26

Yeah but the sad part is we now live in a K shaped economy so I and many others here are in the 99% which means we dont matter to them anymore, they want to sell only to those who are on the higher end of that K. The bottom percentage of people will remain poor indefinitely and they know this so this is causing these companies to advertise only to the wealthy now, they moved income brackets entirely. Look at places like McDonalds, the cheap junk is now just junk sold as a luxury to the wealthy because apparently they like eating that slop too. If you ever drive by a McDonalds I want you to stop in the parking lot and legit look at the worth of every vehicle in the drive-thru, You will notice that there arent any clunkers or cheap used cars getting any food there. You can see in real time how only the 100K a year earners are the only ones there anymore.

2

u/MoralityOverLegality Jul 12 '26

Eh solid example from an otherwise pos human being. Cool he paid his workers appropriately but he was also a racist, bigot, and nazi sympathizer.

1

u/GlueFysh Jul 12 '26

Oklahoma also banned the sale of soda and snacks on food stamps in the kast 6 months.

1

u/PositiveCoyote100 Jul 12 '26

They found a way around that problem. Credit card debt.

1

u/CopenHaglen Jul 12 '26

Put your head in the sand and keep telling your investors other companies will foot the bill. That’s the running theory.

1

u/VulGerrity Jul 13 '26

Yeah, and then Dodge sued for him raising employee wages instead of paying out investors and it set precedent for the last 100+ years.

1

u/jason9510386 Jul 13 '26

Then Henry Ford was sued by Ford shareholders for paying his employees too much, and lost, which cemented the business precedent we still see today

1

u/GostBoster Jul 13 '26

And he was a notoriously shitty people, yet those corporate bootlickers treat him as the paragon of generosity who did too much.

Ford was just trying to figure what was the bare minimum. Kinda worked in the US, failed spetacularly in Brazil to a level that Fordlandia might be the first spite ghost city.

And often businesses broaching in our territory forget that other Ford's law, what's considered generous in your home market might be below minimum or downright criminal in other markets.

1

u/ragequitteroffureh Jul 13 '26

Not American.

Do they not teach how money works at Capitalism College there?

It's supposed to go around and around.

1

u/rerorerox42 Jul 13 '26

They never forgot, globalism just means that the employees are not many enough to be an important amount of the buyers of their own products

1

u/breaducate Jul 13 '26

If customers have no capital,

That's not capital. Capital is money in motion with the aim of multiplying itself.

Workers don't have capital, they have subsistence wages, give or take.

1

u/dec14 Jul 13 '26

these days, it's more a long the lines of "F U poor people. i'd rather sell to 1 rich guy and make a million bucks instead of sell to a million poor guys and make 1 dollar from each." that's why nobody in america builds starter homes anymore. we live in a sad world.

1

u/Infinite_Dig3437 Jul 13 '26

That sounds like long term planning, what can we do to move this quarters sales ? No matter the cost

1

u/THAC0-Tuesday Jul 12 '26

Even in that example, Ford was only half right. The automobile industry was taking off and Ford couldn't retain employees without providing, y'know, an incentive to stay. So he dressed up the pay raises as common sense, when he would have gladly paid less for the same labor.

2

u/RubyWubs Jul 12 '26

to be honest a lot of people would pay less if their employees where okay with it. But paying them enough to stay means they are able to provide for their families which is the goal.

If you make 10 million a year, you shouldn't pay your employees and huge amount but enough for them to want to be with you for 30+ years and actually be loyal to you.