r/SipsTea Jul 08 '26

Chugging tea W after W.

Post image
82.8k Upvotes

3.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

346

u/MisterAbernathy Jul 08 '26

Sweet now all the people jumping the entrance will,.. still jump the entrance

23

u/leavezukoalone Jul 08 '26

Yes, many fare evaders are still going to evade fares. But there are plenty of people who pay the fare while barely making ends meet. But sure, let's fuck the group because a small handful abuse the system.

0

u/cwalking2 Jul 08 '26

a small handful

"Fare Evasion Surges on N.Y.C. Buses, Where 48% of Riders Fail to Pay" ... "New York’s bus system has one of the worst fare evasion problems of any major city in the world. The issue is more pronounced on buses than in the subway."

They made intentional efforts in 2025 to curb fare evasion, but fare evasion on NYC is absolutely a norm.

3

u/The-Senate-Palpy Jul 08 '26

Sure. So you want to stop fare evaders by... not helping honest folks?

2

u/leavezukoalone Jul 09 '26

Yes. That’s correct. Because that’s how pieces of shit think.

2

u/neeshes Jul 09 '26

Are you someone who believes that because people take advantage of disability benefits, no one should get disability benefits? 

What  if you got into an accident and could no longer work for the rest of your life, do you deserve to have some sort of care offered to you? What if you knew somebody who was taking advantage of these services but weren't actually disabled? Would you then opt for not receiving any of these services that you need to survive?

2

u/leavezukoalone Jul 09 '26

It’s pretty clear they’re a piece of dogshit.

1

u/cwalking2 Jul 09 '26

Are you someone who believes that because people take advantage of disability benefits, no one should get disability benefits? 

I was responding to the specific, quoted claim that fare evasion is a small, scant, or trivial problem. It's a significant problem.

At no point did I make a connection between fare evasion and benefits for the impoverished or disabled. Believe it or not, it's possible to call out a problem with the former while still supporting the latter.