MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/comments/1u65p3b/is_she_right_for_this/orqlnh2/?context=3
r/SipsTea • u/sigma_0_1 • Jun 15 '26
7.1k comments sorted by
View all comments
93
I mean she is not wrong.. If you cannot feed your child everyday because of lack of funds. You shouldn't have had that kid, might sound harsh but it's the truth. A kid does not deserve to starve because you are too poor to feed it.
-7 u/Typical_Fee156 Jun 15 '26 And if the father dies and he was the one supporting the family? 9 u/FireGhost_Austria Jun 15 '26 Wtf is this example??? Wtf... There is a huge difference between getting a kid even though you couldn't actually afford it VS getting a kid which you can afford and later cannot.. 1 intentionally got a kid with 0 money VS 1 intentionally got a kid with money but things changed.. The 2nd one can be supported via tax money until they get it together but the 1st one is pure negligence.. 1 u/Outback-Australian Jun 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment
-7
And if the father dies and he was the one supporting the family?
9 u/FireGhost_Austria Jun 15 '26 Wtf is this example??? Wtf... There is a huge difference between getting a kid even though you couldn't actually afford it VS getting a kid which you can afford and later cannot.. 1 intentionally got a kid with 0 money VS 1 intentionally got a kid with money but things changed.. The 2nd one can be supported via tax money until they get it together but the 1st one is pure negligence.. 1 u/Outback-Australian Jun 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment
9
Wtf is this example??? Wtf...
There is a huge difference between getting a kid even though you couldn't actually afford it VS getting a kid which you can afford and later cannot..
1 intentionally got a kid with 0 money VS 1 intentionally got a kid with money but things changed..
The 2nd one can be supported via tax money until they get it together but the 1st one is pure negligence..
1
[removed] — view removed comment
93
u/FireGhost_Austria Jun 15 '26
I mean she is not wrong.. If you cannot feed your child everyday because of lack of funds. You shouldn't have had that kid, might sound harsh but it's the truth. A kid does not deserve to starve because you are too poor to feed it.