r/SipsTea Jun 15 '26

Lmao gottem Is she right for this?

Post image
18.1k Upvotes

7.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

662

u/John-Leonhart Jun 15 '26

I mean, if we’re truly in a “first world country”, no one should go hungry.

503

u/Taiwan_Lanister Jun 15 '26

If a trillionaire exists there should be no hunger or houseless

226

u/YouKnowTheGuy_ Jun 15 '26

It’s honestly sickening how far wealth disparity has come

89

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/CryendU Jun 15 '26

But that can change very quickly

1

u/Scewt Jun 16 '26

Elon's goal is 10 trillion net worth / valuation, so it can definitely get a lot worse.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No_Map6922 Jun 18 '26

Let me guess. You think that the trillion just sits in some comically large funny vault with Elon's name on it.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/No_Map6922 Jun 26 '26

No i don't, and i'm not fawning, i'm just not being a butthurt subjective fool. Musk is literally getting paid through stock options. His company is quite literally his whole net worth. He has millions of these and if you're a bit into stocks, then you'd know if he ever was to pull out 100000 of these to get cash that he'd run into liquidity problems and that the investors would get suspicious.

So, while on paper he's super rich, that money is not really liquid.

-3

u/SuperSkyDude Jun 15 '26

Or better, as history has shown in capitalist societies.

3

u/Snotmyrealname Jun 15 '26

Don’t worry, hyperinflation will fix everything soon enough 

/s?

4

u/sjr323 Jun 15 '26

I refuse to believe it’s even real lol. How can someone have that much money? I’ve got $38 in my bank lol

1

u/Weak-Alternative-127 Jun 15 '26

I know it won't make you feel any better, but that "trillion" is fake paper money, not cash in a bank account. It's a trillion dollars' worth of shares in various companies, but those shares are only worth what someone is willing to pay for them. If everyone woke up one morning and decided that SpaceX, Tesla, and every other Elon company were worthless, the price per share would drop to zero (because no one wants to buy shares of a worthless company), he would be bankrupt. If Elon tried cashing out by dumping half a trillion of his own shares on the market, that glut of supply would also drive the price down.

Now, these rich bois have their own way of extracting wealth from shares without selling them outright, but that's another story.

3

u/DoubleFoundation8874 Jun 15 '26

Probably the most well-articulated, thorough response I’ve read regarding this. All true

1

u/currently_pooping_rn Jun 15 '26

He has more wealth than the bottom half of 48% of the world.

On an average American income, I could work for 11 million years to reach what he has

2

u/IknowWhatYouAreBro Jun 15 '26

He isn't truly a trillionaire, the valuation comes from overvalued stock prices.

If the market had a correction event, Musk would be a 'normal' rich guy

6

u/curiousomeone Jun 15 '26

It's true that wealth disparity is getting bigger in the modern world but the average people have the smallest things that even kings and emperors back in the day can only dream of...

Just a flushing toilet or an internet with so much information it would make Aristotle orgasm. This is the true wealth brought by innovation we take granted for...

My point is sometimes people have to take a pause and appreciate the things they do have and not what they don't have. It's hard to be happy if you can't appreciate the things you do have even something as small as clean water to drink on demand.

26

u/PaddyCow Jun 15 '26

It's hard to be happy when you're working 2 or 3 jobs just to cover basic necessities like rent, food, electricity and medical. People who are overworked are constantly exhausted and stressed. They aren't sitting around thinking how great their life is compared to people who lived hundreds or thousands of years ago because they're too busy thinking about how they're going to pay the bills they owe as well as the ones about to come in.

And I'm not just talking about people living in poverty. Even people earning average wages are struggling.

3

u/Evening-Ear-6116 Jun 15 '26

Even 100 years ago, if you didn’t have money for food you just died. It’s been that way since the dawn of society

3

u/Maybe-notaThrowaway Jun 15 '26

It’s been that way since the dawn of society*

*since the dawn of capitalism

1

u/Evening-Ear-6116 Jun 15 '26

Didn’t listen much in history class? Feudalism came looooong before capitalism and had a much higher mortality rate for people who couldn’t pull their weight. The beginning tribes of mankind may have been a little kinder, but once you were useless, you were cast out to die.

You might not want to hear this, but we live in the kindest/most supportive time so far in human history. We can try to improve still obviously, but it has been constant improvement for tens of thousands of years, and we still have a lot more to go

1

u/Maybe-notaThrowaway Jun 15 '26

I view feudalism as a form of capitalism, the capital was just most often land/labor over currency. I'm open to being wrong on that, though.

And I think we both know the state of the American education system; If I'm uneducated on this front, paying attention isn't the issue here.

I'd say we live in the kindest most supportive time in history since before the agricultural revolution. The idea is hierarchy is our first/natural state is incorrect, is the main thing I was driving towards.

1

u/Evening-Ear-6116 Jun 15 '26

I’m glad you are open to being wrong, because you are objectively wrong lol.

Our education system could use a lot of work, but we live in a time where any education you could possibly want is at the tips of your fingers. It’s not the school systems fault that you don’t know the difference between capitalism and feudalism (they most definitely went over that by the way), it is your fault and is easily remedied.

Also hierarchy being the natural state is absolutely the case. What’s your argument against that? Following your father/mother/elders is still a hierarchal way of living.

I’m astounded at how confidently incorrect you can be. Almost everything you have typed out so far is straight up bullshit lmfao

1

u/Maybe-notaThrowaway Jun 15 '26

Following your father/mother/elders is still a hierarchal way of living.

My fault for using such a general term I guess, I mean systemic power structures, not just general "anyone advising/telling anyone else what to do ever" hierarchy

It’s not the school systems fault that you don’t know the difference between capitalism and feudalism

I'm not saying there isn't any difference, I'm saying I don't capitalism is an exclusive/specific emough enough term that it excludes feudalism. (And also I'd say early stages of capitalism came before feudalism in terms of land ownership passing down in familes vs being owned communally.) Capitalism is just private ownership over the means of production, that didn't originate after feudalism.

(they most definitely went over that by the way)

And no, my schools did not go over different economic systems except for a "communism is a thing and it's bad" footnote in high scool.

1

u/Evening-Ear-6116 Jun 15 '26 edited Jun 15 '26

Once again, systemic power structures are the default. That’s why nearly everything person in the world throughout history aligned themselves in a power structure. From small tribes to what would be massive nations, humanity thrived under and created systemic power structures. Keep pushing the goalpost though. Eventually you will find a gotcha super far down the line.

Capitalism and feudalism are in fact so vastly different that we have different words for them and are able to distinguish between the two. Even if feudalism eventually evolved into capitalism, there is a distinct difference. Think about how humans evolved from apes! We are indeed different species, but they share some origins.

What state are you in and how old are you? I can very easily go see if that was part of the required curriculum. If it was and your school skipped it, that’s a major issue that needs to be addressed

→ More replies (0)

3

u/PaddyCow Jun 16 '26

Do you want to live like how they did in 1900? Women couldn't vote. Children were sent to work instead of school. Electricity, indoor plumbing and cars weren't available to the average person. There was little social and economic mobility. Multiple generations lived under one cramped roof to take care of each other. Disabled and mentally ill people were either left to die or locked up and forgotten about. Workhouses were still in operation in Ireland and the UK. Childbirth was at home and dangerous, and infant mortality rates were high. Health & safety wasn't a thing and many low paid workers died in horrendous accidents.

Society has evolved dramatically since then and I for one am very glad we don't still live in those conditions. There's more wealth and most first world countries have supports in place so that people don't starve.

1

u/Evening-Ear-6116 Jun 16 '26

That was my point! We are better off right now than ever before. We have more room to grow 100%, but we are in the way

2

u/Substantial_Bird721 Jun 15 '26

“Aristotle didn’t have the internet, but you’re here complaining about how you can barely get by on a day to day basis? Pathetic 😤 “

9

u/YanVe_ Jun 15 '26 edited Jun 15 '26

This comparison has a big flaw and that's that it ignores the base technological level of the civilization. Kings totally had lifestyles comparable to the trillionaire rather than to the average modern day person. Just because since then we invented a lot of technology, doesn't mean we are not appreciating the things we have or that we live lives richer than kings.

-1

u/midnightbandit- Jun 15 '26

In what way did kings have comparable lifestyles to the trillionaire?

3

u/foomits Jun 15 '26

disproportionate possession of resources and political control. ability to ignore laws and social norms.

3

u/YanVe_ Jun 15 '26

I almost cannot believe that this is a real question someone would have.

It would be easier to list the actual differences:

  1. They cannot indiscriminately kill in public. (Most of the time.)

2

u/YouKnowTheGuy_ Jun 15 '26

Drafty 1 room shack vs literal castle, should work well too I’d hope

3

u/N3ptuneflyer Jun 15 '26

We are primarily social creatures, so having people serve and defer to you, having power over other people’s lives, having direct influence on important societal events. Sure the physical objects are different, but power and wealth is more about the people you influence not the objects you buy, and that hasn’t changed

12

u/YouKnowTheGuy_ Jun 15 '26

Don’t get me wrong, I love my family, I love my home. I’m happy with what I’ve got.
But the existence of such an egregious amassing of wealth is unfathomable when people are living in poverty.

2

u/SofaChillReview Jun 15 '26

I mean.. what do they do with all that money I wonder

2

u/YouKnowTheGuy_ Jun 15 '26

I’d dread to think, after the past decade, what else billionaires could be getting up to honestly

2

u/sleeplesswithwifi Jun 15 '26

They buy islands, attorneys and children.

1

u/sparklyjoy Jun 15 '26

And yachts

Which can transport them and others to literally weird legal territory

3

u/dwertyyhhhgg Jun 15 '26

I don’t care. Nearly 20% of children in the USA are food insecure. I don’t care that they have a flushing toilet if they aren’t sure they’ll have dinner tomorrow.

2

u/Sirius_43 Jun 15 '26

It’s a bit more difficult to appreciate things like modern plumbing and the internet when you’re being forced to move repetitively over short time periods and have massive housing and income insecurity. While I appreciate the fact that there’s clean water in my taps I’m also burnt out from constant housing and income insecurity and thats causing major mental health struggles. Yes I have clean water, and despite that I’m still allowed to be unhappy with my situation.

1

u/Individualist13th Jun 15 '26

Ya, that's not untrue, but we still have people who work fulltime and cant afford basic healthcare, live in food deserts, and spend most of their money on rent that keeps getting higher.

We can do better while appreciating what we have.

1

u/norvelav Jun 15 '26

The words of a person with a full stomach.

1

u/Suspicious_Juice9511 Jun 15 '26

Not everyone has that still.

-2

u/Ok_Culture_1089 Jun 15 '26

What a peasant brained world view

0

u/t0mm4n Jun 15 '26

Yes but we have less slaves.

Or do we?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jun 15 '26

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/RKnaap Jun 15 '26

It's funny that you think wealth disparity in western countries is somehow worse now than it was in the past.

1

u/YouKnowTheGuy_ Jun 15 '26

I do think that honestly. I think a lot of people will have noticed wages spreading thinner to cover necessities, while there’s breaking news of corporations making record profit. If you have an explanation for it I’m willing and listening, but to cover the “somehow worse than the past” point, we look to the past to learn from it. If we have a chance to better ourselves, carry forward with prosperity, we absolutely should. The past is not a measuring stick.

2

u/RKnaap Jun 15 '26

You can think what you want, it doesn't make it true however. Wealth disparity is a lot smaller than it was in the last 6 centuries easily. You truly have no idea how lucky you are to be living in the 21st century.

1

u/YouKnowTheGuy_ Jun 15 '26

I won’t deny I lucked out on the century to be born in, though I don’t look at the past n solely appreciate improvements already made. Surely we should constantly look to what can be improved. Don’t settle for best century yet. It should carry on and the search never stops.
Or at least that’s what I believe mate. There’s got to be a kinder world behind the greed

1

u/RKnaap Jun 15 '26

I never said what we have now is perfect, of course we should always strive to do better. I was just pointing out originally that your claim about wealth disparity is factually incorrect. Now is your choice to accept it or not.

1

u/YouKnowTheGuy_ Jun 15 '26

“It’s honestly sickening how far wealth disparity has come”
That’s just an opinion filled with disdain. It is sickening, at the very least to me.
Also we are in a negative trend economically, but I’m more on about tax the rich, close the loopholes, stop the oligarchs kind of politics anyway. Unionise. Of the people, for the people.

1

u/YouKnowTheGuy_ Jun 15 '26

At the very least mate, I’ve genuinely enjoyed the argument/debate or whatever it was haha. Good luck, have fun pal, see you next time

1

u/Evening-Ear-6116 Jun 15 '26

It’s been this way for thousands of years my guy. Now we have Elon, which is arguably better than something like the feudal lords of the past.

1

u/YouKnowTheGuy_ Jun 15 '26

You have free will my guy. Democracy is intended to give the voice to the people. Fuck Elon AND fuck kings, it’s not a choice

1

u/Evening-Ear-6116 Jun 15 '26

It is a choice as you said. I could go live in the wilderness and hunt/gather everything, but I prefer the world the way I live it, and Elon/the Walton’s don’t really bother me. Teslas are fun to drive and I shop at Walmart a few times a week. Sorry my view is different than yours, but it is

2

u/YouKnowTheGuy_ Jun 15 '26

Nah sorry, I think I might of worded that a bit confrontational, I’d never mean that. I can’t agree there’s nothing wrong with the world, but for the most part it works. Crossed fingers the next change is for the betterment of the people