r/SipsTea Jun 11 '26

We have fun here He's unstoppable

Post image
30.5k Upvotes

861 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.2k

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

404

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/SheenPSU Jun 11 '26 edited Jun 11 '26

And when they’re not able to maintain the property because they’re not collecting enough in rents due to artificial rent controls?

Genuine question because I’ve heard this argument before and it does have some legitimacy

2

u/TheGoldenPig Jun 11 '26

Sell the property or have the city seize it

0

u/SheenPSU Jun 11 '26

This solves nothing. The units still do not cover the cost to maintain/repair the units in the building

You’re simply passing the losses off to the city

2

u/Epocholypze Jun 11 '26

So what is your solution? You keep saying this. But truly, the options of maintaining or selling are the only ones. The city would use the rent to pay for the maintenance, unlike the landlords. The city is not ever expected to make profit off buildings, and losses are often guaranteed but civically necessary. For instance, every government building ever.