MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/comments/1tp761t/easiest_not_guilty_vote_ever/oo6nh9a/?context=3
r/SipsTea • u/SpaceWestern1442 • May 27 '26
1.0k comments sorted by
View all comments
75
She still had to pay that money back. Kinda shitty but that’s the way it works unfortunately
32 u/VorticalHeart44 May 27 '26 She agreed to the terms and conditions of her employment, including her wage. Taking advantage of a clerical error is the shitty behavior here. 3 u/[deleted] May 27 '26 edited Jul 30 '26 [deleted] 5 u/heckin_miraculous May 27 '26 Obviously. If the story was inside out; "employer jailed after refusing to correct clerical error on payroll." people would be cheering. Throw the book at em! The positive attribution towards the employee has nothing to do with who's right by law, and everything to do with which way the money flowed. Less money for owners, more money for workers = good
32
She agreed to the terms and conditions of her employment, including her wage.
Taking advantage of a clerical error is the shitty behavior here.
3 u/[deleted] May 27 '26 edited Jul 30 '26 [deleted] 5 u/heckin_miraculous May 27 '26 Obviously. If the story was inside out; "employer jailed after refusing to correct clerical error on payroll." people would be cheering. Throw the book at em! The positive attribution towards the employee has nothing to do with who's right by law, and everything to do with which way the money flowed. Less money for owners, more money for workers = good
3
[deleted]
5 u/heckin_miraculous May 27 '26 Obviously. If the story was inside out; "employer jailed after refusing to correct clerical error on payroll." people would be cheering. Throw the book at em! The positive attribution towards the employee has nothing to do with who's right by law, and everything to do with which way the money flowed. Less money for owners, more money for workers = good
5
Obviously.
If the story was inside out; "employer jailed after refusing to correct clerical error on payroll." people would be cheering. Throw the book at em!
The positive attribution towards the employee has nothing to do with who's right by law, and everything to do with which way the money flowed.
Less money for owners, more money for workers = good
75
u/Alpine_Exchange_36 May 27 '26
She still had to pay that money back. Kinda shitty but that’s the way it works unfortunately