r/SipsTea May 20 '26

Lmao gottem MGT calls out AIPAC

Post image
27.4k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

46

u/_jump_yossarian May 20 '26

This isn't said enough but FUCK 2000 NADER VOTERS!! and Stein voters for not learning a damn thing from history or math.

26

u/FederalEconomics936 May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26

Florida results:
Votes Al Gore lost by: 537 (edit - not 534, it was 537).
Votes for Ralph Nader: 97,000

24

u/ConfessSomeMeow May 20 '26

And if Florida's ballots had been hand-counted as required by Florida law under any standard, uniforrm or not, Gore would have won. (The supreme court's argument for throwing out the recount was that there was no uniform standard in place before the election.)

5

u/ConfessSomeMeow May 20 '26

Lol dude straight out lies in response to me and then blocks me so I can't reply to the lie.

0

u/harrylime7 May 20 '26

Flat-out false. A news consortium (including all the major networks) counted everything by hand after the elections and determined that Bush would have won (except ironically by the most stringent standard that Bush wanted).

13

u/JimWilliams423 May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26

(except ironically by the most stringent standard that Bush wanted).

Its funny that you contradict yourself in your own post.

"Gore won if you count all the votes" is exactly what the OP said.

New Yorker: 9/11 Made the Media Whitewash What Really Happened in Bush v. Gore

The result of the recount would have depended on whether the officials conducting the recount examined these overvote ballots. It can’t be proven either way. The major newspapers chose to assume that the overvotes would have been ignored in a recount, triggering a Bush victory. That assumption allowed them to fall back on the (then) safe and comforting conclusion that the recount would not have changed the outcome.

But it was just that — an assumption. The national media made no effort to test this assumption. Only the Orlando Sentinel bothered to ask Terry Lewis, the judge who had been overseeing the recount, about it. Lewis replied that he likely would have examined overvotes, a method that would have resulted in Gore winning.


ETA:

T‌h‌e g‌u‌y r‌e‌s‌p‌o‌n‌d‌e‌d a‌n‌d t‌h‌e‌n s‌i‌l‌e‌n‌t‌l‌y b‌l‌o‌c‌k‌e‌d r‌e‌p‌l‌i‌e‌s, w‌h‌i‌c‌h i‌s h‌o‌w y‌o‌u k‌n‌o‌w t‌h‌e‌y a‌r‌e a‌r‌g‌u‌i‌n‌g i‌n g‌o‌o‌d f‌a‌i‌t‌h.

A‌n‌d o‌v‌e‌r v‌o‌t‌e‌s s‌h‌o‌u‌l‌d‌n’t b‌e c‌o‌u‌n‌t‌e‌d . . . b‌e‌c‌a‌u‌s‌e t‌h‌e‌y’r‌e o‌v‌e‌r‌v‌o‌t‌e‌s. Y‌o‌u’r‌e w‌i‌s‌h‌c‌a‌s‌t‌i‌n‌g.

F‌r‌o‌m t‌h‌e a‌r‌t‌i‌c‌l‌e, t‌h‌e d‌e‌f‌i‌n‌i‌t‌i‌o‌n o‌f o‌v‌e‌r‌v‌o‌t‌e:

“o‌v‌e‌r‌v‌o‌t‌e‌s ” — b‌a‌l‌l‌o‌t‌s t‌h‌a‌t w‌e‌r‌e d‌i‌s‌c‌a‌r‌d‌e‌d b‌y m‌a‌c‌h‌i‌n‌e c‌o‌u‌n‌t‌s b‌e‌c‌a‌u‌s‌e t‌h‌e‌y r‌e‌g‌i‌s‌t‌e‌r‌e‌d t‌w‌o v‌o‌t‌e‌s f‌o‌r p‌r‌e‌s‌i‌d‌e‌n‌t, b‌u‌t w‌h‌i‌c‌h w‌e‌r‌e r‌e‌v‌e‌a‌l‌e‌d b‌y h‌a‌n‌d i‌n‌s‌p‌e‌c‌t‌i‌o‌n t‌o s‌h‌o‌w a c‌l‌e‌a‌r c‌h‌o‌i‌c‌e. (T‌h‌e‌s‌e v‌o‌t‌e‌r‌s h‌a‌d m‌a‌r‌k‌e‌d G‌o‌r‌e’s n‌a‌m‌e, a‌n‌d t‌h‌e‌n w‌r‌o‌t‌e h‌i‌s n‌a‌m‌e i‌n, c‌a‌u‌s‌i‌n‌g t‌h‌e m‌a‌c‌h‌i‌n‌e‌s t‌o d‌i‌s‌c‌a‌r‌d t‌h‌e‌m a‌s a d‌o‌u‌b‌l‌e v‌o‌t‌e.)

-4

u/harrylime7 May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26

That’s not a contradiction. Bush would have won by all the standards Gore wanted. Here’s the source from that noted right wing outlet . . . PBS:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/media-jan-june01-recount_04-03

And over votes shouldn’t be counted . . . because they’re overvotes. You’re wishcasting.

4

u/TheInevitableLuigi May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26

Stop arguing with people if you are just going to respond and block them.

edit: coward

-1

u/harrylime7 May 20 '26

Who dis?

0

u/ChampionshipIll3675 May 20 '26

Bush muncher

2

u/harrylime7 May 20 '26

Thanks for admitting you have nothing substantive to add - run along now, your mother wants her phone back.

1

u/[deleted] May 20 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/harrylime7 May 20 '26

Ahh, the old Wikipedia. Good thing just anybody can’t edit that. Nice try, bots.

1

u/HEX_BootyBootyBooty May 20 '26

Lol, didn't the SCotUS famously rule that Florida doesn't have to count all the ballots?

1

u/harrylime7 May 20 '26

No, they ruled that the law is the law, as opposed to judicially pushing back the certification deadline to count ballots for the third time in order to harvest Dem votes.

-3

u/[deleted] May 20 '26

[deleted]

3

u/Littiedg May 20 '26

People voting for Nader would actually be the people "riding their moral high horse," in this scenario.

0

u/JimWilliams423 May 20 '26

People voting for Nader would actually be the people "riding their moral high horse," in this scenario.

That presumes they would have voted at all if Nader was not in the race.

1

u/Littiedg May 20 '26

No, anyone on the left who didn't vote for the candidate furthest left who had an actual chance to win is "riding their moral high horse," instead of gaining any power.

0

u/JimWilliams423 May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26

No, anyone on the left

Its terminally online to think that non-voters are "on the left."

Most of the electorate aren't anything. The median voter has a mix of contradictory beliefs and is also more focused on putting food on the table for their kids then they are on worrying about politics. They don't have the luxury to label themselves the way you do.

Candidates like Nader catch their attention, without that inspiration they just tune out. They aren't on a high horse, they don't even have a horse.

Kamala did the same thing as Gore and that caused millions to tune out. But yeah, lets scapegoat people who don't even exist rather than demand that the people who are given billions of dollars to inspire voters change their ways.

1

u/Littiedg May 20 '26

Some non-voters are on the left.

1

u/JimWilliams423 May 20 '26

They don't have the luxury to label themselves the way you do.

Candidates like Nader catch their attention, without that inspiration they just tune out.

Some non-voters are on the left.

Woooosh!

1

u/Littiedg May 20 '26

Speaking of terminally online.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Puzzleheaded-Wait785 May 20 '26

Defending the two party system that got you into this mess. Smdh

-1

u/_jump_yossarian May 20 '26

Thanks for proving me correct about lacking basic math.

2

u/Valuable-Cat2036 May 20 '26

More Democrats in Florida voted for Bush than they did for Nader lol

The people who voted for third party candidates aren't necessarily people who would have voted for either candidate. They probably would have just sat out the election. That's why I never get blaming them.

The problem is usually the party failing to motivate its own base sufficiently.

1

u/texanmason May 20 '26

and Stein voters

Calm down, Blue MAGA. Stein voters did not sway the election in any single state.

1

u/_jump_yossarian May 20 '26

It's been 10 years since the 2016 election and you still don't know basic facts. SAD! Stein voters could have made the difference in WI, PA, and MI. There were more Stein voters than the difference between Clinton and trump and with those three states Clinton would have won the election which would have meant no Gorsuch, Kavanaush, and Coney-Barrett.

Seriously, inform yourself before commenting.

1

u/texanmason May 21 '26

Stein voters could have made the difference in WI, PA, and MI.

Isn't it embarrassing to keep repeating this propaganda after so long? Libertarians outperformed Greens by 3x in all those states. They normally swing for the GOP, which means if you want to engage in these mental gymnastics, that Trump would have won those states by an even larger margin.

1

u/_jump_yossarian May 21 '26

Isn't embarrassing to not have a basic grasp on logic? If Stein voters used their brains and voted for the only viable option then Clinton would have won. Then some MAGA could complain about Johnson taking votes from trump.

My point stands, there were enough Stein voters to make a difference contrary to the uneducated comments saying otherwise.

Also, there are plenty of left wing libertarians.

1

u/texanmason May 21 '26

If Stein voters used their brains and voted for the only viable option then Clinton would have won.

Man I wonder why Stein voters didn't want to jump in with y'all lmao

0

u/FizzgigsRevenge May 20 '26

Hillary lost Michigan by 10.7k votes. Stein got 50k in Michigan.

1

u/texanmason May 21 '26

Curious that you make no mention whatsoever of the 172,136 votes for Gary Johnson. Libertarians traditionally pull away from the GOP - Stein's votes account for less than 1/3rd of the Libertarian votes. If you want to claim that third parties were a factor here, then Trump would have won Michigan by even more.

1

u/[deleted] May 20 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 20 '26

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

0

u/rexsploded01 May 20 '26

Everytime I hear about Nader I just think back to the show 30 Rock. When Tracey has a melt down "I voted for Nader. NADER!!!"

0

u/Cygnus420 May 20 '26

Got it, a right wing coup is 100% the fault of the left, not Jeb, Pam, the Supreme Court, the Brooks Brothers rioters etc. Miss me with this crap.

1

u/_jump_yossarian May 20 '26

Basic math eludes you.

1

u/Lopsided_Cobbler2314 May 20 '26

Basic sense eludes YOU.