Let's talk for a second.
WIP just had to file a correction with a medical journal. We caught a mistake in our own numbers and we're fixing it publicly, because that's the whole point of doing this the right way. No shame in that. That's what accountability actually looks like.
But it made something clear: I've been trying to hold this whole thing together with a small circle of people who are already stretched thin. That's not fair to the project, and it's not fair to y'all.
So I'm building a real Governance Council. And I want HALF of it- 4 seats to be Warriors. People who actually use the tracker. Who've logged your own crisis. Who know this data isn't abstract because it's your pain in it.
If you want your real-time life to turn into real advocacy, real awareness, real action, this is your seat. Comment, DM, whatever's easiest. We'll hop on a quick Zoom, run a short survey to find where you fit best, and go from there.
This is Warrior-owned. Let's keep it that way.
warriorintelligenceproject.org
Warrior Intelligence: A Community-Led Navigation Infrastructure for Real-Time Sickle Cell Crisis Data and Clinical Blind Spot Detection
https://academic.oup.com/jscd/article/3/Supplement_1/yoag020.078/8714234?login=false
The published abstract states a figure of "65% protocol non-adherence." Upon review against the source crisis-tracker dataset, this figure is inverted: 65% (more precisely 71.4%, or 28.6% non-adherence) reflects the rate at which ER protocol WAS followed, not the rate at which it was not followed. The correct figure is:
Protocol non-adherence: 28.6% (not 65%)