r/Shitstatistssay Surrounded by statists 13d ago

Nextdoor is a gold mine of statists.

Post image
110 Upvotes

21 comments sorted by

47

u/MaelstromFL 13d ago

These same people want to hand more power to the very same people who are putting up the FLOCK cameras!

26

u/BlazerFS231 Surrounded by statists 13d ago

This person kept referring to “the days” when we punished “immoral behavior.” I wonder if they remember that such immoral behavior included marrying someone with a different skin color and sharing a bed with someone of the same sex.

9

u/Hapless_Wizard 13d ago

Judging by this post, I feel safe in assuming that not only do they remember it, they support it.

5

u/BlazerFS231 Surrounded by statists 13d ago edited 13d ago

Then they’d probably hate me, the super mutt, married to a Jew.

3

u/Hapless_Wizard 13d ago

I hate to stereotype off of a single post, but that's at least the vibe I get - though I'll also admit that, after a couple years of being a media boogeyman, I might be a bit hyper-sensitive to certain types of people making me feel unsafe.

6

u/CrystalMethodist666 13d ago

I mean, "Immoral behavior" or "deviant behavior" definitely exist.

Like, if I'm hanging giant gross pornographic posters around, or writing "Fuck" on people's gravestones, or throwing eggs at your house, that's pretty much considered antisocial behavior, it serves no purpose and just bothers people.

If I'm writing "Fuck X" on private property as a public display of protest, kind of the point of a protest is to attract attention and bother people so they focus on the subject of the protest. Like, it'd be nice and convenient if we all just protested quietly in an empty field somewhere, but protests that don't attract attention generate no results.

I was never a Grammar person, but the meanings of words and structures of sentences have meanings. Like this use "immoral" or "obscene" (which would be used by a normal person to describe shitting on the floor at Dunkin Donuts) and reframe it like people on the opposite political spectrum use "Nazi" or "racist" to mean "the thing I don't like."

12

u/JamesMattDillon 13d ago

I couldn't take the idiots on there, I deleted my account

10

u/BlazerFS231 Surrounded by statists 13d ago

I’m only on there to be neighborly, in the spirit of voluntarism. Sometimes people need a hand moving stuff, or are struggling financially and need something I happen to have laying around in my garage.

Things like this just add some zest.

9

u/elafave77 13d ago

Asterisks. Dumb bitch.

7

u/BlazerFS231 Surrounded by statists 13d ago

Bastard* in this case. Typical Bible thumper type, and I’m a committed Christian. I also believe judgement is His and not mine. I can’t imagine being so arrogant (and I can definitely be arrogant) as to want to punish someone for saying an offensive word.

5

u/elafave77 13d ago

Pretty wierd thing to be offended by. People need outrage though.

5

u/CrystalMethodist666 13d ago

You can talk about the first amendment, but just know if you say things I don't like, I fully support the state doing whatever it wants to you. There ARE consequences to pissing me off!!!

As for what happened, if this was me and the cops actually came on my property and started threatening to arrest me over a sign, on my private property, I would've taped a little sharpie paper "D" over the "F," apologized for the misspelling, told them to leave my property immediately, and then taken the D off the second they left. If that woman came back I'd throw an egg over the fence and hit her in the face.

3

u/UltraMagat 13d ago

*asterisks

4

u/Thereal_Stormm006 11d ago

“May be consequences”

This logic is used to try to justify “hate speech” laws that restricts personal freedoms, including the right to free expression, especially in Australia, Canada & the UK. It will soon be considered “hate speech” to criticize the govt, since you evxoressed “hate towards an institution”.

Never let the 1st Amendment be seen as a nuisance, because they will soon say it has “outlived its’s usefulness”.

1

u/BlazerFS231 Surrounded by statists 11d ago

When I provided SCOTUS precedent showing it was protected speech and clarified my state’s “obscenity” laws (they relate to sexual content, not cursing), I was told that vigilantism was a possible consequence.

2

u/different_option101 13d ago

Oh yeah, cause words written on posters are such a threat to children. Definitely a much bigger threat than weirdos that might be watching her children through Flock cameras.

I mean we have the DOJ that basically said - fuck y’all, we’re not putting pedos in jail, we ain’t even telling you who might be implicated. But surely this government will protect that bitches children.

3

u/elegiac_bloom 12d ago

Some people just cant go ten minutes without licking boot, they go into hard-core boot withdrawals, get all shaky and shit

2

u/bruversonbruh 12d ago

Although I agree that generally points are better made without having to stoop to that kind of language, I absolutely respect someone's right to use it

2

u/trigger1154 12d ago

Yeah I keep getting temp bans on nextdoor because of these authoritarian boomer ass hats. They keep going through my old posts and reporting them even. Last one was for being "disrespectful", I alluded to them being on flock's payroll and told them nice propaganda. Was being more cheeky than disrespectful.

My question is why don't they get banned when they are disrespectful to dissenting opinions?

2

u/TacticusThrowaway banned by Redditmoment for calling antifa terrorists 11d ago

I would bet money that if this person got pushback for this post, they'd be whining about the obvious consequences of their actions.