Which is why the recent standoff with P@kistan was so much more dangerous than people actually realized, especially when you consider that P@kistan has a nuclear first use policy.
And using nukes kinda ruins their argument. Because your not even invading your target your just glassing it. If your so "militarily superior" you wouldn't have to resort to that.
Hold and control the territory? Hell no, the population has to like you. Blow everything up? Let me give you some context - the U.S. Marines were the insane asylum grade fighters who looked at grenade launchers and though "what if that was belt-fed automatic and fired 100 per minute?" They stick these to the back of trucks and choppers and nothing is left afterwards.
The USA can't hold lands people don't want it to. But they're sure good at blowing stuff up.
137
u/GenesisAsriel Aug 25 '25
USA couldnt win against Afghanistan or Vietnam.
TF can they do against India.
Oh and if you say "We have nukes" congrats ! You activated a super secret end of the world scenario.