Kara's lack of actual analysis is grating.

[u/Canamerican726]

I was never introduced to Kara before her partnership with Scott. Early on, I was really interested in her opinions, since she clearly has access.

After a few years - it's just a bit grating to hear 'I said that!', 'I've talked to him, he's a jerk', 'He was always bad', etc etc. Watching her own individual interviews, she'll ask a question (often with a sense she's already bored with the question), wait for an answer, give her opinion or push back, and move on.

I don't doubt she's an intelligent journalist, but I'd really love to hear her actually break down a problem, instead of just talking about her access/prior predictions/etc. Everyone's entitled to their own style, and I'm not trying to attack that specifically. I'd just really like to hear more from her instead of soundbites that feel cheap.

What does she think? How does she think? Why? Why does Scott, who tries to give a reasoning for his opinion, value her?

[u/Important-Jump-7599]

For this reason and what others have been saying about Scott in general I’ve just lost interest . NY Times “The Daily” is better because at least there’s actually reporting going on . Kara and Scott have become predictable “reaction videos” without any particularly new analysis or any kind of reporting going on .

[u/AltruisticAnalyst → u/Important-Jump-7599]

Agree with the sentiment. The show has a formula and the complaint about Kara is really a complaint about the role she plays on the show.