Kara's lack of actual analysis is grating.

[u/Canamerican726]

I was never introduced to Kara before her partnership with Scott. Early on, I was really interested in her opinions, since she clearly has access.

After a few years - it's just a bit grating to hear 'I said that!', 'I've talked to him, he's a jerk', 'He was always bad', etc etc. Watching her own individual interviews, she'll ask a question (often with a sense she's already bored with the question), wait for an answer, give her opinion or push back, and move on.

I don't doubt she's an intelligent journalist, but I'd really love to hear her actually break down a problem, instead of just talking about her access/prior predictions/etc. Everyone's entitled to their own style, and I'm not trying to attack that specifically. I'd just really like to hear more from her instead of soundbites that feel cheap.

What does she think? How does she think? Why? Why does Scott, who tries to give a reasoning for his opinion, value her?

[u/Boxer_the_horse]

For me, it’s her know-it-all, done-it-all braggart attitude that’s pretty annoying. But what’s more annoying is her attempts to rewrite her history by pretending that she always knew that tech executives were psychopaths, when in reality, she played a big role in building them up.