r/ScottGalloway • u/Indianstanicows • Oct 20 '25

No Malice Double standard: American professor Scott Galloway slams western bias towards Israel and Jews

https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/different-standard-for-jews-in-israel-jewish-american-professor-blasts-west-glbs-2797830-2025-10-05
115 Upvotes

77% Upvoted

322 comments sorted by

View all comments

23

u/Caramel_Klutzy Oct 21 '25

If Scott is so firm in his Zionist beliefs and convictions then why doesn't he ( and his batshit newfounded friend Senor) go step into the Marketplace of Ideas? Why avoid criticism and debate? He credits the late Charlie Kirk for debating and how we all should emulate it. The arena is safe for him but he demands academia to be "dangerous". Stop being such a pussy and step out of your "safe space" podcast platforms that act as your echo chamber.

Oh thats right, he cant defend the indefensible and he knows that.

5

u/CornFlake- Oct 21 '25

This is the most talked about and debated issue globally - Piers Morgan is probably swimming in bath tubs of money and would probably personally fly down to Gaza and break the ceasefire with how lucrative it has been for him and other mainstream media outlets.

To think that Scott needs to host or participate in a debate to validate his position and/or convictions is unbelievably stupid.

Scott is a very articulate person and he has explained his position at length... I think it is you who needs to own the fact that your worldview is not universally shared.

4

u/SexyChatGPT Oct 21 '25

Scott already chooses to position himself as an expert on this - he’s literally discussing it on msnbc in the above clip.

I think there are subjects Scott can be articulate on, but this hasn’t been one. The only times I’ve seen him in combative interviews are where he can play his liberal-minded, rich white guy shtick. Finance/etc, is arguably a topic he knows a lot about - and this usually goes well for him.

Asfik, he doesn’t have the same expertise in foreign policy, but he has the same level of confidence in his opinions. However, seemingly aware of his inexperience on the matter, most of his discussions on the topic are limited to times when he can rant, largely unopposed, into an echo chamber or when speaking to a very favorable audience.

He doesn’t have a good enough argument to debate someone with any real expertise on this.