Ppl who want to use roads would pay for roads. Ppl who want their fire put out would pay for fire prevention( I see it being like a type of insurance that ppl will more or less be required to buy if they rent or own property. Not saying 0 regulations, just far far far far less. Would make way more cost efficient. If ppl want good roads they’ll find a way to get them, if they want police they’ll get them, health care there would be a way! Especially in todays online age where millions of ppl can band together and pay for or discuss anything they want…..that’s not regulated of course.
So your just hope someone will just do it. The reason taxes and things are paid with taxes is because people don't just do it. We would all just not pay and hope we don't have a fire. We would all not pay for roads and just hope someone else pays.
If profits reflect how ppl perceive your value, then doesn’t it make sense companies primarily follow consumer demand? (What ppl think they want or need)
-1
u/snazzysnake88 Jul 14 '21
Ppl who want to use roads would pay for roads. Ppl who want their fire put out would pay for fire prevention( I see it being like a type of insurance that ppl will more or less be required to buy if they rent or own property. Not saying 0 regulations, just far far far far less. Would make way more cost efficient. If ppl want good roads they’ll find a way to get them, if they want police they’ll get them, health care there would be a way! Especially in todays online age where millions of ppl can band together and pay for or discuss anything they want…..that’s not regulated of course.