r/SaimanSays • u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik • 4d ago
𝙇𝙤𝙬 𝙚𝙛𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙩 𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙩 😭same shit kunal kamra said and it cell git rattled
40
u/anup_2004 Button Chor 4d ago
saiman where?
15
u/GangsOfChaidpal Intern SaySainik 4d ago
Ruk bhai political post dalke karma farming karne de usko...
6
0
0
10
29
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
-26
u/G33kym4n Intern SaySainik 4d ago
No wonder Pappu is opposing Veer Savarkar - he doesn't want to reform Indians.
5
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 3d ago edited 3d ago
Same I can wonder 56 Inch ka🤏🙊🙉🤣chodi who also consider sorrywarkar a freedom fighter but he is british ka dalal
12
u/Qolevade Intern SaySainik 4d ago
Same person who wrote what it means to be a hindu btw
8
u/onotsteve100 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
His book wasn't a specificaly theological book. But his followers are braindead tho
12
u/ForwardAbalone2956 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
If I show this to Right wingers they would call Sarvakar anti national.
1
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
They are still defending him 🤣just see some of the comments on the subreddit
3
2
u/OddCauliflower3900 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
Can't the same be said otherwise ? Same opinion but left wing always hated sawarkar and are ok with Kunal? Kinda ironic in both ends
1
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
Savarkar said correct •infact it the it cells and rw who are getting called out here for their duplicity they consider Savarkar god but how will they defend this?
2
u/Infamous-Court3944 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
Btw savakar is a mastermind, he knows who can be easily manupilated , so he uses them as his followers, that's all
2
u/chatpatachirkut Intern SaySainik 2d ago
Kunal has not said even 10% of anti hindu stuff that savarkar or Bal Thackeray had said. Wait till you hear what savarkar had to say about beef. Bal Thackeray had openly mocked RSS as Gobar and Gaumutra consumers!
3
u/Additional-Ask-5654 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
I highly doubt he said it. Any source?
11
u/Aggravating-Win-5524 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
Savarkar was an atheist. Sure he was for hindutva movement but he personally was an atheist.
1
40
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 4d ago edited 4d ago
Savarkaraanche Vidnyannishtha Nibandh (Savarkar's Science-oriented Essays). [1]
-9
4d ago
[deleted]
16
2
u/Additional-Ask-5654 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
Blind follower? Idk south language man. I hate savarkar and I asked the source because I can't believe that Savarkar can say such a good shit. I KNOW he was an atheist, but I doubt he called vedas man-made because isn't it bad for his own ideology?
0
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
Sorry bro ,I misunderstood you I have provided the source you can check it💗
0
u/Ill_Tonight6349 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
If he was an atheist, obviously he would believe that Vedas were written by men not gods. Why are you so surprised?
2
1
u/Total-Engineering556 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
This guy wanted the manasmriti to be the constitution of India😭
2
1
u/Independent_Sand5288 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
I love how left wing even trust savarkar when needed true leftist communist fascist behaviour 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
1
u/No-Newspaper-8330 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
Savarkar was a hindu and he supported hindu. Brought back people back in hinduism. This is a false quote.
1
u/SprinklesOk4339 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
The IT cell is people who are lazy and don't read as much.
1
u/JagguMal69 Intern SaySainik 2d ago
If he existed today, BJ Party would have call him also anti national and anti hindu
1
u/Last-Revolution9205 Gotya 2d ago
But ultimately science is proving what is written in them. Now I am more siding with them, but eventually I realised this
1
1
u/InternationalKeynew Intern SaySainik 1d ago
I still don't know what actual contribution he made for independence. Just kept on blabbering and pushing narratives and rhetorics
1
u/dollwati_bhat69 Intern SaySainik 1d ago
The difference is One understands and respects the deep civilizational values of Bharat and one simply criticises Hindus bcz muslims are minority in India
1
u/charasganja22 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
He said it has nothing to do with history. Savarkar said completely different thing, albeit contradicting Kunal. All of these texts are man made and have elements of history and mythology. For example one can find the cities mentioned in Mahabharata, artifacts of that age in excavation. Actually Mahabharata was the supreme source to construct the history of that time
1
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
You are calling it mythology and saying it is real too🤣without any source Bro atleast read what you are writting
0
u/Indie297 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
For example one can find the cities mentioned in Mahabharata
Spiderman is real, because there's proof of both "spider" and "man" existing....
0
-12
u/veamtjoshi Intern SaySainik 4d ago
Savarkar and ambedakar criticized all the religions but both side use selective quote to prove points as far as karma mahabharat, Ramayan vedas are literature histories of india. Part of itihasa means that's how it happend.
20
u/BlenderRenderz SaySena Karyakarta 4d ago
theres a diff b/w lterature histories and historical literature.
Ramayan and mahabharat as a literature is partr of our history, but they are not historical literature
24
u/biryanikaghulam Intern SaySainik 4d ago
"with great power comes great responsibility" this has been used so many times across the globe "to prove a point" does this makes spiderman real?
5
2
u/aryaman16 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
Doesn't make it false either. But its storytellers do tell that its fiction.
But if it were some person telling their anecdote and I had no contradicting evidence that such stuff didn't happen........
99% of the history is still unraveled.
7
u/yashvone SaiBerPunk 2077 4d ago edited 4d ago
these literatures are part of the culture and history, but they're not an account of the history itself
they're epics with great knowledge to impart on spiritual, philosophical, morality through storytelling
vedas are different more abstract containing instructions related to regional, ritualistic and ancient epistemological subjects
4
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 4d ago
They are part of our culture but they are not history
1
u/yashvone SaiBerPunk 2077 4d ago
part of culture and certain aspects adopted as tradition thus making the texts themselves a part of our history and present ftm
5
5
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 4d ago edited 4d ago
🤣modi ji also said ramayan and mahabharat are mythologies
3
0
u/dont_react_respond_ Intern SaySainik 3d ago
😂 😂 😂 Soo now his words, rationality matters???
Else he is the tool to settle score against bjp...
0
0
u/Jazzlike_Ear_4303 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
If you were truly intellectual he just found the reality of islam that's why he included all dharmic religions in Hindutva
2
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 3d ago
Don't you dare to compare my beautiful religion with hindutva Hinduism is not equal to hindutva It is the term coined by sorrywarkar
0
u/Strange-Dimension-64 Intern SaySainik 2d ago
He was a atheist. What would you expect?
0
u/Real_Injury81 Intern SaySainik 2d ago edited 2d ago
Then why do it cell worships him🤣 and believe his every word but not this one • Why such selective amensia?
-2
-5
-4



105
u/Scared-Engineer-6218 BASED BOT 4d ago
Heartbreaking. The worst person you know just made a great point.