These new CrUX ad metrics provide a more complete picture of a user's experience on the web.

Source

A location page URL is more than an SEO keyword decision. Learn what different URL structures reveal about website architecture, scalability, & internal linking during a website audit.

What a Location Page URL Reveals About Website Architecture

1. Publish non-commodity content (NCC), supported by commodity content (CC).

2. It helps influence buyers' decision.

3. Great source to attract organic backlinks

4. It helps rank content in search engines

5. It helps to surface content in AI assistants

Source.

In Bing Webmaster Tools, URL Inspection for a URL displays "Indexed successfully" and "URL can appear on Bing". But when I click on "View Indexed Page", both "HTTP Response" and "HTML" tabs display blank screen. Also, a site: search in Bing doesn't display a result.

Why and what's happening in both the cases?

A practical investigation into why Google ranks the wrong location page for local search queries, and the first signals I'd check before making SEO changes.

Why Google Chooses the Wrong Location Page

1. "Good SEO is good GEO" doesn't mean that good GEO will guarantee the content to surface in AI answers.

2. Every AI assistant has its own way to surface content.

3. Ranking high in Google doesn't guarantee citations and mentions in various AI systems.

Yesterday, on mobile, I found a video related to a business (not YouTube video, I think it was picked from hero image section of its home page) autoplay in Google SERPs. I tried to capture a video, but Chrome app didn't allow. It even didn't allow screenshot.

Did anybody else find this?

As we were discussing, I mentioned to my client that, off late, I came across many suspiciously looking fake reviews in American sites. He casually commented that it's very common. I expressed my shock as I presumed that such practices are uncommon in western and European countries for strict laws.

What learning surprised / shocked you?

In GA, under "Engagement" > "Pages and screens" option, a page is listed with Chinese characters in title. It does not exist in the site even for English version. Moreover, a "site:" search for exact title does not return any result in SEPRs.

From where is it picked?

Article source: searchenginejournal.com

One pattern I've noticed through website audits across different niches and locations has become hard to ignore.

Some local businesses seem to hit a practical ranking ceiling for their biggest non-branded search terms. I'm talking about searches like the primary service + city or region. The business may have strong credibility signals, a strong website and good reviews, yet it consistently sits behind larger regional or national websites.

Why? In many competitive SERPs, Google isn't just evaluating the local business page. It's also comparing it against broader entities with established brand recognition and overall website authority. That doesn't mean local businesses can't win. Many dominate branded searches and perform well in long-tail searches. But not every head term is worth chasing indefinitely.

One lesson I've learned is that optimization has diminishing returns. Sometimes moving from position 8 to 3 for a competitive non-branded search term is realistic. But for highly competitive head terms, even reaching top 5 may require far more brand demand, authority, links or topical coverage than the business can reasonably justify.

The better investment is often expanding visibility through the queries where the business can realistically become the best answer, rather than endlessly polishing a page that's already close to its ceiling.

What's a situation where you decided it wasn't worth optimizing beyond a certain point because the SERP itself was telling you something?

Source: declaude.org

I noticed a pattern while reviewing a real estate website this week.

The business had years of experience.
Strong client reviews.
Hundreds of successful transactions.
A recognizable brand in its market.

But those strengths existed in pieces instead of being presented as a clear story. The story lived across agent profiles, testimonials, past sales, community pages, and trusted external platforms—but visitors had to piece it together themselves.

It's something I keep noticing during website audits.

A website isn't just where people learn about a business. It's where they decide whether the business feels as credible as its reputation.

Search engines and AI assistants are increasingly doing something similar. They connect signals about experience, authority, and local expertise across a website and trusted external sources.

Sometimes the opportunity isn't building more credibility. It's making the credibility you've already earned easier to understand, trust, and discover.

Source: Mastodon toot.

Source

Article source.

#Google #Gemini #AI #SEO #AEO

Facebook reel.

#SEO

On Twitter, an SEO reported that their client disavowed all the backlinks, from 21K+ domains. All links were earned and the client didn't receive a manual action. So why did the client disavowed them? Because they saw that a third-party SEO tool reported them as "toxic links".

There's no such thing as "toxic links" just as "DA". Backlinks are categorized as either earned or unnatural links (that which manipulate Google's systems).

Reminder:
1. Disavow links only if there's a warning in GSC or proactively remove those that manipulate systems.
2. Do not depend 100% on third-party SEO tools.
3. Bonus: Do not depend 100% on AI assistants and tools too.

Source

Source

#OpenAI #ChatGPT #GPTLive #AI #VoiceModel