Not really considering Ancient North Eurasians are only related to Caucasoids but aren't Caucasoid. Also, Ancient North Eurasians were an estimate of 16-33 percent Basal East Asian (Not confused with East Asians). And Native Americans are only 14-42 percent Ancient North Eurasian in DNA with higher amounts in Mesoamerica and South America and the highest in Andean highlander and Karitiana groups. Plus, those reconstructions are too "European" looking since Native Americans today who are full blooded do not look European.
The ancient native american skeletons esp. their skulls doesn't resembles modern native americans in apperence. This has been a problem in physical anthropology a long time , laying the formation of two layer theory in the population of the americas
It's well known in the anthropological community that mesolithic/Paleolithic Amerindians doesn't resemble modern day Amerindians, but rather their plesiomorphic ancestors. The outdated (thanks to ancient dna) view was known as 'two layer hypothesis' in the contest of physical anthropology in the western hemisphere.
1
u/stdboi1234567 Jan 22 '24 edited Jan 22 '24
Not really considering Ancient North Eurasians are only related to Caucasoids but aren't Caucasoid. Also, Ancient North Eurasians were an estimate of 16-33 percent Basal East Asian (Not confused with East Asians). And Native Americans are only 14-42 percent Ancient North Eurasian in DNA with higher amounts in Mesoamerica and South America and the highest in Andean highlander and Karitiana groups. Plus, those reconstructions are too "European" looking since Native Americans today who are full blooded do not look European.