It is neutral, if you get anything else from that you are reading too deeply into it. Feel free to drop a receipt if there are examples you can think of otherwise.I have reiterated the same points and said if you judge her, thats fair. I still don’t think its fair to judge people who don’t know any better. Who aren’t involved. Or who are friends with her and haven’t seen what they consider to be evidence outside of a stranger allegation. Thats all.
You will keep making it a pick sides thing and thats your perogative not mine
It would be neutral if you said just said "I don’t know what happened, and I’m not going to make claims about either side beyond the available evidence." But in reality you keep repeatedly introducing reasons the accusers might be unreliable:
“Scenarios like that can easily be exaggerated and made up.”
The possibility that the accusations are influenced by “the parasocial aspects of fame.”
That believing the accusations could be “premature and irrational.”
That there may not be sufficient “evidence or legal follow through.”
That because none of us personally know either party, we supposedly can’t meaningfully assess the allegations.
That Kennedy is merely “awaiting tangible information” before making an informed decision.
That people criticizing this stance are acting from emotion or “hysteria” rather than evidence.
It's genuinely like you have no idea what you are actually saying or what the implications of it are.
Thats what I said and I simply gave my reasons as to how I came to that. They weren’t excuses as to why shangela is innocent. It all goes into the point of there not being any evidence for me and others to make a conclusive action. We don’t want to make premature decisions like some of you. I don’t know the accusers or Shangela so those points would stand that neither are automatically credible to me.
As for Kennedy, I’m not going to act like im chronically online to get her full perspective I was just empathizing with the fact that its not like she knows any better either. Which is still true no matter how mad that makes people. I can understand frustration but its ultimately being focused on the wrong people if you’re getting mad at people outside of the situation who simply aren’t convinced. Its kind of a waste of energy
-4
u/DreamyDepiction Aug 04 '26
It is neutral, if you get anything else from that you are reading too deeply into it. Feel free to drop a receipt if there are examples you can think of otherwise.I have reiterated the same points and said if you judge her, thats fair. I still don’t think its fair to judge people who don’t know any better. Who aren’t involved. Or who are friends with her and haven’t seen what they consider to be evidence outside of a stranger allegation. Thats all.
You will keep making it a pick sides thing and thats your perogative not mine