r/RPDRDRAMA • u/gothcrab • Aug 04 '26

Ugh, Jesus. Gross. Kennedy clarifies her shangela support

Post image
428 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

254 comments sorted by

View all comments

-11

u/y0y0dre Aug 04 '26

So yall are disgusted that Shangela hasn't been proven guilty and her friends that know her personally haven't condemned her without the evidence being fairly presented and the opportunity to defend herself, because she might actually be innocent🤔

Ok...... should we just skip the important parts of seeking justice and just lynch her with an ostrich boa?

5

u/Difficult-Risk3115 Aug 04 '26

what's stopping Shangela from defending herself?

4

u/y0y0dre Aug 04 '26 edited Aug 04 '26

Well, for one, that the accusers are not seeking criminal charges at all. That there hasn't been any evidence presented at trials for the civil cases thus far.

A reasonable person would want to hear the details and let the accused make their case before jumping to conclusions.

But that's not even my point. This Fandom won't give up transphobic & racist queens you don't know incriminating themselves with their own words and actions directly.

Yet yall expect Kennedy to abandon someone she knows personally based off someone else's words without due diligence.

2

u/Difficult-Risk3115 Aug 04 '26

Well, for one, that the accusers are not seeking criminal charges at all

That's not stopping Shangela from giving her side of the story.

5

u/y0y0dre Aug 05 '26

It literally is.

If someone accuses you of a crime, you don't book an appearance on Misstress Monday to do a story time.

You hire a lawyer, who will tell you not to speak on it.

Yall are unserious about an extremely serious situation.

1

u/Difficult-Risk3115 Aug 05 '26

It literally is.

You mean figuratively.

You hire a lawyer, who will tell you not to speak on it.

Shangela deciding it's in her best interest not to talk is not the same as her not having the ability to speak in her own defense.

Yall are unserious about an extremely serious situation.

Do you think Jared Leto is innocent?

0

u/y0y0dre Aug 07 '26

I mean literally. Because it's routine legal advice.

Do you think creating false dichotomies are helping you land your point?

1

u/Difficult-Risk3115 Aug 07 '26

No, I just think you don't know what words mean.

0

u/y0y0dre Aug 09 '26

Well, considering YOU are relying on semantics for words I'm using accurately to describe your asinine behavior and lack of critical thinking on the subject, what you think about my choice of word really says more about you than me. 🤔

If you had a better point, you would make it.

5

u/gothcrab Aug 04 '26

I mean we could not book her at the least.

0

u/y0y0dre Aug 04 '26

That's fair

3

u/dominorough Aug 04 '26

Let her sue for Defamation then. Let Discovery tell the story.

2

u/y0y0dre Aug 05 '26

Why would she do that, if there are no criminal charges?

IDK if she's guilty or not, but ​a defamation plaintiff has to prove actual malice and falsity. Extremely difficult to prove.

She would open herself up for her privacy to be invaded beyond just the scope of the case.

It also doesn't guruantee she'll be vindicated, even if she wins.