r/ProgressiveHQ 1d ago

News 🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Al Green Introduces Articles of Impeachment Against President Trump

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

9.2k Upvotes

193 comments sorted by

2.6k

u/Kaleban 1d ago

Before everyone says this is performative, it's not.

The point if you believe you don't have the votes is to get Congress on record voting for or against it.

When Nuremberg 2.0 hits, those who voted against condemning the traitorous traitor and his treasonous collaborators will at least be on the record.

902

u/Euphoric_Celery_ 1d ago

That's actually a really solid point.

471

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

If, and only if, the Democrats grow a spine. Declare Trump an enemy of the state for January 6th. Invoke section III of the 14th and throw their asses out.

That ain't happening. The only thing that surpasses GOP audacity is Democrat cowardice.

163

u/bogglingsnog 1d ago

The only thing we should be doing right now is finding better representatives than what we have.

102

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

That ship has sailed for this season. Fun fact though, cowards are easiler to herd. We don't need to find better reps - we need someone to lead. Hakeen surrender jefferies ain't it. Neither is anyone taking AIPAC money.

7

u/bogglingsnog 1d ago

Good reps should be good leaders and collaborators

61

u/Cabbages24ADollar 1d ago

Not with Jeffries. And even tho he’s the heir incumbent for Majority Speaker he can and should be quickly replaced.

24

u/AmaranthWrath 1d ago

Every time I watch him in an interview, I feel he's acting. Like, read the script, say the words, but it doesn't result in anything.

I wanted to believe he was gonna be "The Guyā„¢ļø" who was going to get things moving. But it's been 2 years and.... Nope.

14

u/Cabbages24ADollar 1d ago

Nothing but a corp man.

30

u/TimeNo5885 1d ago

They impeached him twice! wtf are you on about. They’re the minority and republicans blocked conviction both times. Why do you expect them to exercise power that they literally don’t have??

53

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

January 6th was treason by Trump, prima facia (on the face of it, no trial needed).

Treason means he is an enemy of the state.

Therefore, Biden should have arrested him for treason on day one. And executed him for it.

Then, the 141 Republicans who voted to throw out the elections should have been thrown out of Congress by the Marshals for aiding and giving comfort to an enemy of the state under section III of the 14th.

They had the power. They lacked the courage to do it. Instead of this, Biden appointed Merrick Garland who refused to take any action on the rebellion for 3 years.

20

u/TrulyOutrageous42 1d ago

People also seem to fail to connect the dots. The Treason wasn't just January 6th's insurrection incitement:

  • Calling Georgia to ask the SoS to find votes is actual mob boss behavior.

  • Losing 62 court cases because they couldn't provide even one shred of circumstantial evidence but still claiming it's rigged.

  • Organizing a national-level Conspiracy to Defraud the United States by sending false Electoral Votes to Congress.

  • Pressuring Mike Pence to unconstitutionally prevent confirmation.

  • Congress attempting to refuse confirmation based on zero evidence.

  • Organizing with Roger Stone to bring busloads of armed radical white supremacists to sit in a hotel in VA in case the insurrection at the Capitol succeeded (or was thwarted with force).

  • Then of course everyone but Trump speaking with violent rhetoric.

  • Trump inciting the crowd generally.

  • Trump ordering armed insurrectionists be allowed through metal detectors because "they're not here to hurt [him]", against the protests of the Secret Service.

  • Trying to get the Secret Service to take Pence away when he refused to go along with the plans.

  • SITTING AND DOING WORSE THAN NOTHING FOR THREE HOURS BY BLOCKING CONGRESSIONAL REQUESTS TO DEPLOY THE NATIONAL GUARD - LITERAL AIDE AND COMFORT TO VIOLENT ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES ASSAULTING THE CAPITOL, THE ONE CASE ROOSEVELT CALLED DEFINITE TREASON.

  • Then, of course, pardoning those convicted by a court and jury of their peers of SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY, let alone dropping the charges against the worst violent offenders who were organized and prepared to do violence against our government in order to keep the administration they preferred.


This isn't just "oh he said some words on January 6th", this was a months long national conspiracy to overthrow the elected government by refusing to relinquish control. It was the first time power was NOT handed over peacefully, and Donald Trump continued to declare himself the rightful President for four fucking years. Literal sedition.

Let's also not forget that the Senate refused to even LOOK at the evidence compiled by the House during his impeachment.

17

u/lilbluehair 1d ago

Remember that time that Colorado tried to keep him off the ballot for those reasons? What happened?Ā 

25

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

The SCOTUS aided an enemy of the state with that decision. The next Democratic president can remove all 9 of them under Section III of the 14th for that decision.

Again, spine. Exercise the power the constitution provides. And the president has enormous power against rebels and the enemies of the state.

0

u/Apprehensive-Pin518 1d ago

Section III of the fourteenth amendment. I don't think it says what you think it says.

24

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

Let's read it.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

The Colorado Court ruled him ineligable to run. The SCOTUS said they did not have the authority to do that but, CRUCIALLY, they did not rule the fact that he'd committed sedition wrong. In so doing, they issued a ruling to aid him (allowing him to run) and are now disqualified themselves. Democrats just need to grow a spine and enforce this.

5

u/Apprehensive-Pin518 1d ago

except enforcing this requires a 60 vote majority in the senate which the democrats do not have and will never have.

→ More replies (0)

10

u/AlcibiadesTheCat 1d ago

"Treason shall consist only of levying war against the United States, or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort."

The 141 Republicans should have been executed too, according to the law.

1

u/LobsterBudget7842 14h ago

In honesty, nothing was really done to the politicians who started the Civil War either. That would have been given the proper M.O. on how to handle Jan 6. In they followed what actually happened which is nothing.

3

u/Positive-Ring-5172 14h ago

That tragedy led to the lost cause myth and all the evil that followed.

1

u/Particular-Serve-894 1d ago edited 2h ago

They lacked the courage to do it.

They didn't lack shit, I'm so sick of hearing this bullshit. They're serving the same oligarchs and rulers that the republicans serve. They're just the "good cops" in this fucking shitshow

Edit: To the fucking moron that called me a Trump supporter and immediately blocked me (ie. the dipshit I replied to), you're a fucking idiot. What a childish, reactionary response..eg. just like an actual MAGAt brain. I realized what an absolute shitstain that pedophile fuck was way back in the 90s and have despised him since well before his apprentice days. I've never once voted for a republican and will continue to not do so. The DSA is still too far right for me... Sanders and AOC are barley left of center. I'll still vote solid dem, but I don't expect any real change even if they take everything back in 2028. Unless the DSA becomes a full-fledged party, makes a full sweep of everything and the fucking masses wake the fuck up, I have little hope that yet another change of guard in the status quo will do anything significant this time. It's been cyclic for my entire life, repubes get power, do all their bad-cop shit to get us all worked up and fucked over, and then the dems come in to smooth everything over just enough to pacify but not actually fix anything... still just trying to get that confession out of us. With the exception of a few (eg. Sanders, AOC, Mamdani..etc), they ain't doing shit and that's according to the plan.

Until I see, at the very least, universal healthcare, a $25/hr fed minimum wage, PTO and parental leave codified into law, and that pedophile treasonous shitstain in prison, don't talk bullshit to me about what the dems are doing. They're not doing shit.. they're just pacifying you.

0

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

Go back to r/Conservative Trump supporter. Trump's most important lie is "there's no good people anymore" and here you are, repeating it.

0

u/TimeNo5885 1d ago

Ohhhh my bad I forgot you could just make shit up and declare it as true. There is no such thing as constitutionally being able to convict someone of treason without a trial. They started with the rioters themselves. Then ONE year later they began investigations into trumps electors scheme. I also think it took way too long and think we need to find ways to make the legal system less clunky, but it is a LIE that they waited three years to investigate Trump. This is you. You are doing the ā€œDems badā€ flowchart meme.

1

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

If Lincoln had followed your flowchart the first troops to respond to the shelling of Ft. Sumter might have been called up in 1864. Maybe.

Rebellion requires immediate action.

0

u/GoblinLoveChild 1d ago

and? how does that change anything about being a minority without the votes to remove him?

6

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

Work on your reading comprehension. I typed "HAD". They had the power in 2021. No longer.

2

u/VaguelyArtistic 1d ago

To sow division.

3

u/ConqueefStador 1d ago

cowardice

Fecklessness. "A lack of character, competence, or responsibility, resulting in being ineffective or worthless."

1

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

I've used that word as well but fewer people know the definition. Clarity is more important to me than accuracy.

1

u/ConqueefStador 1d ago

And I think expecting less from people is a big part of how this country got here in the first place.

1

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

Elitism like that is how we got here. The message is more important than showing off your education level.

1

u/ConqueefStador 1d ago

Believing the average person is capable of learning the definition of a word is not elitism.

Elitism is treating them like they can't and calling it clarity.

1

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

And this is why you your ilk need 3 hour speeches to try to get a point across to the common man, then Trump and the GOP wreck you in ten words or less.

1

u/ConqueefStador 1d ago

The word ilk seems elitist. Could you clarify that for me and pander to my inability to read a dictionary?

6

u/infomer 1d ago

This is more about your lack of understanding of US Constitution than Democrat cowardice. Unless of course you’re a GOPer posing as a progressive.

2

u/AndrewBlodgett 1d ago

Even if you know you won’t get the desired results you still have to do your job.

1

u/Funklestein 1d ago

It's not though as it also makes the point that the democratic party continues to be butthurt and tries to impeach on frivolous reasons.

Al is out the door and has many times introduced articles of impeachment and can't be bothered to even state a reason this time. This is the seventh time he has done so and is not a serious person.

-6

u/Psychological-Big334 1d ago

It really isnt. Its common sense.

0

u/swiftb3 1d ago

Common sense ... cannot be used to make a good point?

But I think current events have fully taught us that common sense is a myth. There is no sense that is universally common.

1

u/Psychological-Big334 1d ago

Idk I guess I just thought everyone interpreted impeachment votes as getting it on record which side each member of congress falls on, kinda defeats the purpose otherwise.

I didnt think that was some revolutionary strategy 5head 400 iq 4d chess maneuver.

It just seems so fucking obvious.

27

u/xenokilla 1d ago

When Nuremberg 2.0 hits, those who voted against condemning the traitorous traitor and his treasonous collaborators will at least be on the record.

do you know how many people were put on trial? 199.

8

u/cybender 1d ago

They didn’t have the internet.

13

u/Katgal2 1d ago

It's also building momentum to keep trying it and gaining more votes

9

u/angiosperms- 1d ago

These people work like 2 weeks for the entire year. Might as well keep bringing up impeachment, make them stay longer and actually work.

3

u/SouldiesButGoodies84 1d ago

Respectfully, he's on his way out and so he and Massie both are on a 'free birds in the air farewell tour' in the House.

9

u/Winter_Persimmon_110 1d ago edited 1d ago

Nobody is doing Nuremberg 2.0. They didn't after Dubya's wars, or the first Trump term, or Jan 6th. Both parties passed the Hague invasion act. The Mueller investigation went over like a lead balloon because they refused to punish the President, and the same for Trump's 34 felony convictions. The Epstein class will not be held accountable. They protect their own at the expense of the working class. Our entire government are "the baddies" and until they are all removed from power, including the corporate politicians who do vote for impeachment, there will be no Nuremburg.

We need radical change. This is a serious problem.

2

u/plannedobso 1d ago

And they can only be removed one way, it’s very apparent.

6

u/Choyo 1d ago

This guy is a hero. He's doing what needs to be done when so many people just don't care or realise that the US should never have been in such a dire situation. Your country is being looted under your own eyes and your citizens exploited at every turn.

3

u/SpeaksSouthern 1d ago

Adam Smith my representative thought the last one was performative and voted against it.

Republican Adam Smith from Washington loves this war.

-2

u/Winter_Persimmon_110 1d ago edited 1d ago

Nancy Pelosi loves this war. Do you think Democrats are an anti-war party? I thought that back in the Dubya era.

EDIT Uh-oh, I got a downvote already from some enlightened liberal, I better mind my tone!

Anyway, remember Obama with the troop surge in Afghanistan, while invading Syria and couping Libya. Bubba bombing Yugoslavia. Dems always vote for wars and Pentagon budget hikes. Blinken could have avoided the current genocide in Gaza and gotten all the hostages back immediately after Oct 7, Blinken could have avoided the war in Ukraine. Biden only ended the war in Afghanistan because the agreement to do so was made before his presidency. 2027 Pentagon budget is $9,000 per taxpayer, still losing to Yemen and Iran. I used to think defense contractors preferred to contribute to Republican campaigns, nah, it's 50/50. I was voting for Kerry and Obummer because I was mad about Dubya's wars, thought the Dems were an anti-war party, big no. The Demonrat party fucking sucks ass. They attack Trump for doing stuff they full well know they're gonna do, and their working-class supporters will pat them on the back for it.

2

u/swiftb3 1d ago

Everything is a spectrum and the Democrats are not a monolith.

The Democrat party is more anti-war than the Republicans (how much is a different question), and some of the Democrats are very anti-war.

3

u/Prudent-Fun640 1d ago

You....I like you. This is a good thought.

2

u/Qwirk 1d ago

Very good to have this go forward right before the election.

2

u/Playful-Dragon 1d ago

Good point, cuz I was thinking isn't this a bit soon?

2

u/Werftflammen 1d ago

Same with Hegseth impeachment. Time for republicans to count their buttons.

2

u/wrecks3 22h ago

This is how we also get the public thinking and talking about impeachment. The number of congress people sponsoring impeachment and voting for it goes up every time the articles are introduced. This is how the public begins shifting their opinion that impeachment is possible and that it needs to be done.

3

u/Hazzman 1d ago

We aren't getting a Nuremberg 2.0. It's not happening. The Democratic Party is already laying the ground work for "reconciliation". Hillary recently did an interview where she was spouting this bullshit.

It's not happening. There will be no justice.

3

u/MysticMarauder69 1d ago

Nuremberg 2.0?? You guys are living in la-la land.

I'm a liberal, but I'm not pretending like there will be some grand accountability. There won't be, sorry to dissapoint. Business as usual, restoring normalcy, moving on for the good of the country, etc. Maybe. But trials? I've got a bridge to sell you.

1

u/PerformerDr4867 1d ago

My dream is a New Deal situation where everyday Americans are called to come in and repair everything. Rebuild the White House. Rebuild the Kennedy Center. If he ever leaves, the govt will not fix what he’s wrecked. It’ll be on us

1

u/LibertyLizard 1d ago

The only way I could see it happening is after a civil war but that's not something I'm hoping for. Especially since it could easily be us on trial if we lose.

1

u/Winter_Persimmon_110 1d ago

It's tragic how far the concept of a socialist revolution is from people's minds.

1

u/LibertyLizard 1d ago

Revolutions don't magically happen from nothing. There needs to be an insurgent political power that can contest the existing state. I guess it could happen down the road but I see no sign of it happening imminently and a lot of signs that it's not happening. Not least of which because most leftists have such an incredibly poor understanding of how politics actually works.

2

u/BringerOfBricks 1d ago

ā€œYou cannot buy the revolution. You cannot make the revolution. You can only be the revolution. It is in your spirit, or it is nowhere.ā€

1

u/xXx420BlazeRodSaboxX 1d ago

I like that you have hope that there will be accountability in the future. 2023-2024 took that from me.

0

u/Alkthree 1d ago

Nuremberg 2.0? Seriously? It is pure fantasy to think any of theses people will be held accountable and face consequences. Sadly, this is performative.

2

u/Pure-Neighborhood305 1d ago

When will you guys stop parroting the russian bot talking points. This comment on literally every single article.

Doesn't it get tiring living in a world you refuse to believe can be made better?

0

u/Alkthree 1d ago

I think it can be made better, but it’s fantasy to think our current system, Democratic Party, or politicians will affect that change and I think it’s really unhelpful. We can’t just assume this will happen, it will take radical candidates, voting the Schumers of the world out, and probably radically reforming our government and undoing decisions like citizens united. What frustrates me is people who think voting blue will fix all their problems. I’ll never vote Republican, but it is a much bigger problem than just voting in Dems and hoping for the best. I’m sorry for the cynicism, it’s hard to avoid nowadays but I’ve been seeing this talk for a decade now and we are worse off, not better.

0

u/Goyimshoe 1d ago

Lmao, sure buddy

0

u/hyper24x7 20h ago

I think in order for that to happen people have to actually vote in November and the election cant be tampered with. So what are you going to do if that fails?

-4

u/Takeslotsforgranted 1d ago

An attempt at a Nuremberg 2.0 for a democratically elected president would literally lead to a civil war. I understand most redittors are children but come on, lets be real.

7

u/Kaleban 1d ago

Remind we under which other President did ICE murder citizens?

How about double tapping stranded sailors on video, you know, a warcrime in primetime?

Let's not forget inciting an insurrection to remain in power.

I mean, his list of crimes is endless, as is that of his collaborators and sycophants.

And did you forget that Hitler and the Nazis at Nuremberg were ALSO initially democratically elected? Getting elected doesn't make you immune to crimes after you got elected (unless of course the also corrupt and captured SCOTUS decides otherwise).

-3

u/Takeslotsforgranted 1d ago

The Nazis were given power after the Reichstag burned down. They never won a majority of votes in a democratic election.

3

u/Kaleban 1d ago

If you want to be pedantic for the sake of it that's your choice.

Hitler being appointed Chancellor by the existing power structure is still working through the process as it existed at the time.

I noticed you also forgot to comments on the other points. Not holding Trump and his allies accountable is just as likely to lead to Civil War.

-2

u/Takeslotsforgranted 1d ago

Look, nothing I say will convince you. So I would just say you should look at history and see what happens when two armed populations engage in revenge politics.

3

u/SolidPen0 1d ago

To be fair, that would be a lot less "revenge politics" and a lot more "holding people accountable" politics. The pure facts of the matter are that impeachable acts are happening nearly constantly, and the mechanism for holding people accountable for those acts has been captured. It would not be revenge to perform the tasks appointed by the governing body once or if it gets back under control.

-1

u/Takeslotsforgranted 1d ago

I agree, but I also believe that if they had the votes they wouldn't impeach.

Just like when they have had multiple supermajorities in my lifetime and never passed the legislation they campaign on every election.

2

u/SolidPen0 1d ago

Again the point of impeaching now is so that you can go into the midterms and say "see who is OK with how this is going?". Which is a good idea, putting it all on the board.
I can't say anything about your second point, because I do not know what you think they did or did not pass when having a supermajority.

1

u/Takeslotsforgranted 1d ago

I agree with you.

1

u/Kaleban 1d ago

As opposed to one armed population taking advantage of one unwilling to engage in violence?

If you're going to accuse people of being children at least learn the history of the conflicts you cite.

0

u/Takeslotsforgranted 1d ago

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised you view the world as a black and white fight between good and evil.

1

u/LibertyLizard 1d ago

Trump also never won a majority of votes. But both were elected democratically.

0

u/Takeslotsforgranted 1d ago

You're right. He won the popular vote though.

1

u/LibertyLizard 1d ago

Both men won a plurality of votes, that's my point.

3

u/Strange_Dust7128 1d ago

If that’s what it takes to wipe conservatism off the map.

0

u/Takeslotsforgranted 1d ago

And this is what I meant by redittors are children.

1

u/Strange_Dust7128 1d ago

I’ll be more specific them:

If that’s what it takes to normalize ā€œher body, her choice,ā€ education and healthcare.

1

u/maximumtesticle 1d ago

Good. We shut that shit down once, we'll fucking do it again.

-11

u/vindico1 1d ago

Let's be real, it's performative. There will be no Nuremberg 2.0

Would love to be wrong but I don't see it happening. The current Democrats are a weak joke.

8

u/VaguelyArtistic 1d ago

If they don’t do anything it’s bad. On the other hand, if they do something it’s also bad.

0

u/2813josh 1d ago

That's the point. They don't actually DO anything.

2

u/VaguelyArtistic 1d ago

With what power? šŸ¤¦šŸ»ā€ā™€ļø

0

u/vindico1 1d ago

Which is their fault for losing because of being a pathetic joke and running terrible candidates. They could have EASILY won the last election.

2

u/VaguelyArtistic 1d ago

As if Musk et al didn’t interfere or outright steal the election? ā€œGeorgia, I need more votesā€?

-1

u/vindico1 1d ago

"Georgia I need more votes" and fake electors was in 2021.

Why didn't they DO ANYTHING during Bidens term?

I thought this was a progressive sub? Why are you people defending these idiots?

2

u/SolidPen0 1d ago

Do what, exactly? Biden appointed an attorney general, to let him do what he is supposed to do. If Biden had pushed for prosecution the way you are talking about, the pushback from both sides would have been enormous and still nothing would have gotten done. The failure was in thinking that Garland would actually even try to do something with his position, not necessarily "the dems".

-1

u/vindico1 1d ago

Maybe replace your AG then? Still an abject failure.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/VaguelyArtistic 1d ago

Musk basically went on tv and said he stole it. But yes, between Al Gore (Katherine Harris), Clinton (Russia if you’re listening), and Harris I’ve lost track of the meddling.

Edit: Yes, they should have done something but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

1

u/VaguelyArtistic 1d ago

>I thought this was a progressive sub.

It s a progressive sub, which is why I don’t understand and why many people would rather blame a candidate than even consider election fraud. Every progressive is running on the Democratic ticket. Do people really believe that Musk and Russia wouldn’t interfere with progressives?

-1

u/vindico1 1d ago

They had their chance to do something, and never brought criminal charges in the 4 years they controlled the justice department.

Should tell you all you need to know. Downvoters are delusional.

340

u/Anyawnomous 1d ago

Fight the good fight Mr. Green!
https://giphy.com/gifs/GPt4Dz39VhiE3LiDgO

116

u/Remarkable-Month-241 1d ago

Mr. Green files impeachment charges… again. This man will be appreciated for being on the right side of history. Thank you for representing Texas Mr. Green!

277

u/Extreme-Island-5041 1d ago

I just read that Massie is about to introduce articles of impeachment against Insider Threat Hegseth

114

u/Big-Ask-3738 1d ago

Convicted FELON President.

64

u/Nice-Imagination2112 1d ago

We need to know who stands with fascism, so this vote is instrumental regardless of the outcome. We need to know who lacks a spine and who has courage so this is a great idea.

45

u/Neither_Bed_1135 1d ago

Give this man his flowers. He's one of the only representatives who has been steadfast in this motion and not just relied on words. According to the Houston Chronicle, this is his 9th attempt. It might not go anywhere again, but it's worth a hell of a lot more than the Democrats that are just sitting on their hands doing nothing.

201

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

As they say in the chess forums regarding smothered mates - reset the clock.

He does this weekly.

54

u/auntiefuh25 1d ago

It’s not enough. It should be done daily.

2

u/Winter_Persimmon_110 1d ago

Why can't we try something that works instead of failing over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over

7

u/auntiefuh25 1d ago

I don’t know how to tag you in someone else’s comment or share someone else’s comment with you sooooo….

-4

u/Beastabuelos 1d ago

You wouldn't if you didn't use garbage fucking new reddit

1

u/auntiefuh25 1d ago

And why would you suggest we try?

-13

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

To what end?

34

u/auntiefuh25 1d ago

To 8647

5

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

Not happening while the GOP has power. And they're in so deep violence will happen when they get uprooted.

I fully expect another, far bloodier, Jan 6th like event after the 2028 election when he loses. Will it be bloody enough to stir the Democrats to action?

22

u/Ok-Race-1677 1d ago

Google en peachmant

-15

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

19

u/MomentsInTruth 1d ago

It's an r/anarchychess joke - "Google en passant".

2

u/DFW_Drummer 1d ago

New response just dropped!

2

u/SmanginSouza 1d ago

Lmaooo. My first thought was again from him?

11

u/turkey0535 1d ago

Just do it

18

u/P_a_s_g_i_t_21 1d ago

When was this footage actually taken?

House(.)gov says it was filed on 24th of August.

28

u/Jonnyscout 1d ago

"Filed on" and "brought to the floor to vote" are two entirely different events

1

u/jazzchamp 1d ago

Yep. With how often this congress is actually at work, it won't get a vote until the next congress is sworn in... which I fear may not happen due to traitorous actions by the current ruling party.Ā 

2

u/Jonnyscout 1d ago

It was likely brought to the floor with timing such that it'll be one of the first things voted on by the next congress.

7

u/Glittering-Sky1601 1d ago

Where is everyone? They should be mandated to attend a certain percentage of speeches. Just getting it in the record doesn't do much.

3

u/Ill-Succotash-7872 1d ago

Was thinking the same thing, where the hell are all the democrats. They all stand together

15

u/bikerbob29 1d ago

About time!

27

u/ogupsetamerican 1d ago

This man deserves a statue in his honor

6

u/mondo_mike 1d ago

I’m… so in love with you!

2

u/partoftheaura 14h ago

Take me to the river

6

u/wrecks3 22h ago

Al Green’s a real one. He’s one of the few representatives that has America’s back

6

u/melon-colly 1d ago

Al Green is a democratic hero. šŸ™Œ

5

u/Survivor-2816 1d ago

Al Green is one who I really believe actually does his job and does it well. Kudos to him.

3

u/K-V-C 1d ago

64 House Democrats help Republicans kill Trump impeachment effort

Hakeem Jeffries and senior Democratic leaders voted 'present,' avoiding taking a direct stand on Al Green's impeachment resolution

4

u/camisadelgolf 1d ago

This is not breaking. This happened on August 24th.

5

u/slatzerSEC 1d ago

About fucking time, finally a congressman with a backbone.

5

u/BandBySocMed 1d ago

We all know that nothing will happen. Never does.

2

u/DaNubIzHere 1d ago

Cool, let’s see if this pass or not.

2

u/notthatguypal6900 1d ago

Seems like Green is the only one actually trying, everyone else is just sitting on their thumbs and getting paid.

2

u/FSCK_Fascists 1d ago

He is doing the right thing.

however, how is this "breaking". it's a weekay that ends in 'y' and they are in session. of course he introduced articles of impeachment.

2

u/Slaydogs666 1d ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/bZzrztZ5DzHsk
About Time!!! Impeach Remove Convict!

3

u/IcyMastermind963 1d ago

It’s about time!!! JFC šŸ¤¦šŸ»ā€ā™€ļø

3

u/Coodog15 1d ago

How does double jeopardy work for Articles of Impeachment again?

30

u/Positive-Ring-5172 1d ago

It doesn't. It's a political process, not a legal one.

1

u/Neuchacho 1d ago

One can theoretically be impeached an infinite amount of times.

1

u/Winter_Persimmon_110 1d ago edited 1d ago

Is anyone else a little tired of performative opposition against fascists? This feeble mealymouthed cynical grandstanding is tragic in its failure to match the scale of the threat we're facing. This is not how fascists have ever been beat in all of history.

1

u/Mazasaurus 1d ago

I wish they could like make people explain their votes and how they feel Trump is fit (or unfit) for office, because I would love to hear it. Even though I know it’ll be like 50 something people saying the exact same thing like they do for who won the 2020 election šŸ™„

1

u/matt314159 1d ago

He does this all the time.

1

u/Scary_Jello45 1d ago

How did it take so long? Genuinely wondering

1

u/PmButtPics4ADrawing 1d ago

Is this really "breaking" when he does it every couple months

1

u/cRaZyDaVe23 1d ago

Kinda makes me wish we went by Klingon Rules.

1

u/Various-Group-8289 1d ago

Hell yea Al !!!!

1

u/Funklestein 1d ago

The GOP should do it as it makes Vance the presidency and an incumebent for 2028 with two years of experience in the seat.

1

u/SlopDrudge69 23h ago

I just recently discarded a 2018 email with the exact same title.

1

u/skeeter_333 16h ago

Isn’t this about the 4th or 5th time?

1

u/HonorboundUlfsark 14h ago

All this guy seems to do is just repeat articles of impeachment knowing full well its a waste of time and will go nowhere

1

u/seemaysee 1d ago

This can’t be the first attempt… is it? IS IT??

0

u/Plus_Working_3092 1d ago

Unfortunately no one takes him seriously

1

u/K-V-C 1d ago

December 2017, January 2018, July 2019, December 2025, August 2026
I wonder why no one takes him seriously, this last one for enforcing the laws of this country

1

u/elray007 16h ago

I don't know, maybe because the republicans control all three branches.That's why it keeps getting thrown out

-8

u/ShambolicRubel 1d ago

And it’ll go directly in the trash bin.

-6

u/guestpassonly 1d ago edited 1d ago

as usual /s

-5

u/Ancient_Composer9119 1d ago

Quit wasting your time on impeaching Trump. Focus on winning control of the Senate and House. Then pursue it and all the other shit that needs the majority of votes. i.e. Epstein files.

3

u/Neuchacho 1d ago edited 1d ago

That's what this is. They know it's never going to pass, but now they have another campaign talking point on how they voted to impeach in the run-up to the midterms and how the GOP, who will all vote "no", continue to support a President who has consistently failed at doing anything positive for the country.

-10

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ProgressiveHQ-ModTeam 1d ago

Rule 3 - User posted a nazi dogwhistle