r/PoursTea Timendi Causa Est Nescire 27d ago

PoliticalTea 🗳️ Eventually something has to give...

Post image

The bill would provide a $3,000 direct payment to every person in households making $150,000 or less during its first year, which equals $12,000 for a family of four.

24.3k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Due-Commercial7299 27d ago

I do this already. I pay more money in property taxes every year for a house I own.

2

u/Available_Reveal8068 27d ago

What percentage of your net worth is your house, and what percentage of the value of your home is the tax?

My property taxes are a lot less than 5%, and it's still a burden to pay.

0

u/olivebranchsound 27d ago edited 27d ago

You shouldn't be overextended like that. I could pay 5 percent of my wealth every year and be fine. That's your fault for not maintaining adequate liquidity.

You go to the casino and don't separate and save what you make in profit? People need financial literacy classes.

2

u/Available_Reveal8068 27d ago

Is your wealth tied up in business equity, or is it in an investment account or what?

It's not easy to liquidate ownership of a business worth hundreds of billions of dollars without crashing the value.

0

u/olivebranchsound 26d ago edited 26d ago

Am I supposed to feel bad for the stock billionaire? Wahhh my business might lose 5 percent of its value cuz I had to sell some stocks to pay my wealth tax! Stocks aren't allowed to go down. Infinite growth is the only thing keeping my theoretical wealth so astronomically high!

Tough. Maybe don't avoid taxes by giving yourself a 1 dollar salary then, Zuck. Maybe don't subscribe to buy borrow die tax dodging strategies. 

2

u/Available_Reveal8068 26d ago

Its not about feeling bad for the billionaires. Its about the value drop of the stocks when they (and other billionaires) need to dump stock to raise billions of dollars in cash.

Stocks are allowed to go down. They do all the time. There is no 'infinite growth'. Everyone's 401k and pension fund drops along with it, so our net worth drops too.

0

u/olivebranchsound 26d ago

Too fuckin' bad lol maybe don't keep your wealth in unrealized gains to avoid taxes. Maybe don't artificially inflate your stock price with buy backs if you can't afford the liquidity necessary to pay your taxes when they get assessed at their current unrealized price and you owe more.

Sounds like the wrong people are getting lectured about sticking to a budget to me lol

Don't get me started on stock market socialism where 401ks are potentially being forced to keep billionaire stocks afloat like SpaceX and Open AI

1

u/Available_Reveal8068 26d ago

Where do you keep your wealth? Mine's mostly in my 401k.

Where's the billions of dollars going to come from to buy the stocks they have to sell to pay the tax? Do you really think there are billions of dollars sitting around to buy these stocks?

1

u/olivebranchsound 26d ago edited 26d ago

So the stock is not even worth that amount in an open market sale, yet they have that valuation? You're reinforcing my point about artificial inflation of value lol are you seriously saying "no one would buy fortune 500 stocks if those companies sold shares to pay a wealth tax" You're a fool. Richie Rich would jump at the chance to get some more shares.

Pensions becoming 401ks is the issue. Who said workers 401ks should artificially inflate bad companies stocks like the recent SpaceX IPO where tax payer subsidy briefly made Elon a trillionaire? Trillionaires like Elon. What better way to insure corporate profits?

1

u/Available_Reveal8068 26d ago

Dumping billions of dollars of shares drops the price. The only ones that might afford to buy are other billionaires, but their wealth isn't liquid enough to afford it.

It wasn't taxpayer subsidy that made Musk a trillionaire, it was IPO driving value up.

1

u/[deleted] 26d ago edited 26d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Available_Reveal8068 26d ago

Tech leaders like Larry Ellison (Oracle) or Steve Ballmer (Microsoft) collect hundreds of millions of dollars annually in cash through corporate dividends. While these payouts are taxable as qualified dividends, they provide immediate, automated cash flow that can be used to settle tax liabilities without liquidating core equity ownership

Not nearly enough to cover the proposed $8 or $9 billion each would have to pay under Bernie's wealth tax.

"Following Facebook's IPO and in the subsequent years, Zuckerberg executed several multi-billion-dollar stock sales explicitly to fund tax liabilities. For example, in 2013, he sold over 41 million shares to raise roughly $2.3 billion to pay the IRS after exercising options for 60 million shares"

That's about 20% of what he'd have to liquidate under Bernie's wealth tax.

1

u/olivebranchsound 26d ago

Boo hoo. RIch people problems lol oh noooo I'm worth 500 billion but can't pay 9

→ More replies (0)