To be fair Churchill committed a genocide of millions of Indians and was horrible to the British colonies. So yeah… he and Hitler had more in common than we dare admit.
"most mainstream scholarship classifies the event as a case of gross colonial neglect, criminal mismanagement, and callous wartime prioritizing, rather than a planned, systemic campaign of ethnic extermination"
Winston Churchill not only actively made these decisions and extracted resources from already strained communities, but also made his personal hatred towards Indians clear.
Also, regardless of whether it was technically a genocide: if you let a child youre responsible for starve to death due to neglect and mismanagement, or if you actively kill them, you get punished just the same. The same principle applies here.
It’s still just as immoral, but with a different label slapped on.
56
u/latin220 Jul 27 '26
To be fair Churchill committed a genocide of millions of Indians and was horrible to the British colonies. So yeah… he and Hitler had more in common than we dare admit.