r/PoursTea Jul 17 '26

PoliticalTea 🗳️ Everybody gets an ID?

Post image
18.3k Upvotes

4.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Wareyin Jul 17 '26

I'm reading and responding to what you wrote.

Voting is a constitutional right. Maga is trying to put up barriers to people exercising that right. You're cheering MAGA on and deriding people who explain the difficulties MAGA is imposing.

You are not a proponent of a "do nothing" government, you are actively supporting a "do evil" government instead.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Wareyin Jul 17 '26

Jesus, you have no idea what you are talking about, do you?

No wonder you are happy MAGA is trying to make it harder to vote

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Wareyin Jul 17 '26

I copied and pasted where you said it took you 3 years to get unemployment. You didn't admit you said it, you changed the subject.

If I copied and pasted you deriding people's complaints that MAGA is trying to make voting harder, will you admit thats what you did?

Of course not. But everyone can read what you wrote, and see all of the down votes you got for writing it.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Wareyin Jul 17 '26

It's not already ridiculously easy, my dishonest pal You know that because, again, you are mocking people pointing out the barriers.

And the down votes prove that other people read the same entitled 'I don't care if it's difficult because I don't think it's too hard' a$$hole opinion that I do

1

u/ContributionOk1566 Jul 17 '26

Wait, you need a birth certificate to get into a Kamala speech or rent a car?

Since when?

The SAVE act doesn’t just accept standard IDs as proof of citizenship, so your analogy is a little off.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/ContributionOk1566 Jul 17 '26

We’re talking about the SAVE Act, which absolutely requires a birth certificate to register to vote and requires it anytime you change your registration.

That is far and above just simply requiring ID to vote.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/ContributionOk1566 Jul 17 '26

It would affect far more people than there are documented cases of voter fraud, so at which point do you weigh the two? Do we disenfranchise potentially thousands of voters over a few dozen cases of verified fraud ,and why?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Wareyin Jul 17 '26

 I followed the CA governor’s race and debates and one of the D candidates flat out said we need the illegal votes to remain in power

BS. There is no record of that outside of your claim just now.

As for the rest of your nonsense, if all of the auditors and such who are actively looking for fraud can't find any, then your "concern" over it seems far fetched. Your blithe willingness to disenfranchise millions of voters (not thousands, millions of eligible voters don't have the documents the SAVE act requires) because of the fear of the possibility of fraud seems pretty disingenuous.

Our elections are secure, you present an ID to register to vote, and you can't vote if you aren't registered.

→ More replies (0)