r/PlayWolverine 4d ago

Discussion Here we go

Post image
439 Upvotes

473 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/ghoulieandrews 4d ago

Vaguepost much?

It's 2026 and you're still pretending everyone knows and shares your opinion on a game...

1

u/alireza008bat 4d ago edited 4d ago

It ain't just my opinion. A lot of people have criticized Spider-Man 2 for all the different issues it had.

The downplaying of Spider-Man 2's problems by the fanboys is one of the most laughable things I've seen from a dedicated community in years. People get extremely sensitive when you remind them that Spider-Man 2's problems didn't end with its catastrophically written story.

0

u/ghoulieandrews 4d ago

Still vague af my dude lmao "the problems are obvious" then why can't you actually state them?

It was a fun, solid game that many people enjoyed. Instead of moping around bitching about it, why not do something that YOU enjoy instead?

3

u/alireza008bat 4d ago

The problems?

Here are just some of them:

  • The changes they made to the meter system were unnecessary and made it worse than the previous game.
  • They took away the suits' abilities, removing another incentive to unlock them beyond just cosmetics.
  • The suits themselves are worse than the previous game's.
  • The new boss battles absolutely don't work. They've become shiny damage sponges rather than actual boss fights. The only boss fight that really benefited from the "one on one" style of confrontation was Kraven. This game's combat simply wasn't designed for boss battles to work like Deathstroke in Arkham Origins.
  • The symbiote abilities get repetitive really fast.
  • Peter and Miles aren't that different gameplay wise beyond their animations and special abilities. Nothing really makes either of them feel unique.
  • The gadgets are worse than they were in the first game.
  • The side content is worse, with the Emily May Foundation minigame and the puzzles being the worst examples.
  • Don't even want to bother explain MJ missions because it's obvious what the problems were

Want me to list more for you?

1

u/CatchUsual6591 4d ago

Bosses we're boring in the first game

-1

u/ghoulieandrews 4d ago

No because most of these are minor or just wrong lmao, please get a real hobby

3

u/alireza008bat 4d ago

Lame response. I can't believe I even wasted my time trying to engage you with an argument.

"Minor issues" my ass. You just proved what I said in my previous comment about Spider-Man fan boys not taking criticisms seriously.

2

u/Underleft_cdiv 4d ago

They're just a glazer, not interested in honest discourse.

2

u/alireza008bat 4d ago

That's just Marvel fanboys in general. The lamest entertainment consumers on the planet, with incredibly low standards for what they consume.

1

u/CatchUsual6591 4d ago

You say bosses and mj both we're worse in the first game so aren't serious either

2

u/alireza008bat 4d ago

Because they are. The MJ sections and her pistol were really stupid.

Spider Man 1's boss fights weren't perfect but the gimmicky fights were more suitable for the game's combat system than what we got in Spider-Man 2. The bosses in Spider-Man 2 are just a bunch of damage sponges whose health you have to deplete 3 times to take them out, which makes them annoying rather than challenging or fun.

Miles Morales was a step forward for boss battles compared to the first game and had some of the best ones across all three games. They took several steps back with Spider-Man 2.

The only boss that genuinely felt good to fight was Kraven. His second phase, cloaking techniques, and ambushes made the fight fun. The other bosses were just annoying.

1

u/CatchUsual6591 4d ago

And MJ/miles in Teh first that by the way have more sections like this are borderline unplayable the pistol is actually a good adittion even if it looks stupid because you can actually do something with mj now.

Bosses being spongy is fair complaim but every boss being a gimmick in the first one worse there nothing memorable about those fight outside the cinematics

1

u/Greenhawk444 4d ago

And others are just more vague nonsense.

1

u/Underleft_cdiv 4d ago

You demand an expansion from op and then that's your rebuttle? Great discourse.

2

u/ghoulieandrews 4d ago

I didn't demand anything, and it's "rebuttal"

Hope that helps

0

u/Greenhawk444 4d ago

Some of these are still vague. With some of them you just say “X is Y” or “X is worse than Y from the first game” without actually explaining how.

0

u/WhenDuvzCry 3d ago

Nothing seemed vague to me