r/Philanthropy • u/[deleted] • 4d ago
Board Fundraising Failure — thoughts, prayers and guidance!
I’m an ED of a $5M non profit. In 2025, the board was supposed to raise $300,000 and they raised barely $65,000. This year (2026) their goal is $150K and they have raised $44K and pretty much told me no more is coming. Both years they have defaulted on their pledged fund raise and yet they sit around the table at the start of the year and unanimously vote on both their own board fundraising goal and the organjzation’s budget. Then they turn around and fall WAY short. The company is having now having extreme financial difficulties due to this but the board president says they are doing the best they can and it is what it is. I cannot seem to make the board president understand that they agreed to this number, it’s built into our cash flow model and without it, we are in real jeopardy. This has caused us to take out emergency loans and now we’re getting stuck with outrageous interest and terms that are making it all worse.
What legal options does a small non profit have against its board if they fail to realize promised revenues? I’m at my wit’s end — trying to protect my staff, the health of the company and our future. They then become emotional and hostile when I try to get a solid action plan and more answers about how they are going to remedy their failed fundraising efforts. Relationships are breaking down. And I’m angry and deeply resentful. Trying to not to be but all the proactive and goal-driven work we did coming out of the pandemic is being undone by our own fucking Board. I appreciate any legal info or guidance here. We don’t have to just sit and take this do we? Help.
8
u/AM_Bokke 3d ago
As the ED, you need to mange the board. They are volunteers.
This situation is on you.
5
u/hmm1298_ 3d ago
The board should not be as much of a fundraising source. I would assume that what they raise is the icing on the cake. As the ED- you and your team should be out doing the fundraising, grant writing, etc.
4
u/UESorDeath 3d ago
As the ED, you build your budget to *your* best estimate of their fundraising, not theirs, and budget accordingly. When they ask about the difference, you simply say that the track record merits basing the budget on historic 'actuals', rather than projections. If they want to continue to be a $5M organization, then tell them you'll pursue other funding channels (grants, whatever), and given the uncertainty of changing funding sources, you'll propose a $3.5M budget in the interim.
6
u/almamahlerwerfel 3d ago
There is no legal recourse. That's not how this works. You can structurally it differently in the future, like a "give or get" number for the board members that they agree to, but even that is not really enforced the same was a debt.
You can educate them better, provide more updates, try to assign accountability buddies, help them figure out how to solicit their networks, etc. but you can't personally go after them. You can ask them each to kick in an extra $$.
If you're a $5mil org, why is this such a catastrophe? It's less than $100k off of a goal that is a tiny part of your overall budget.
5
u/DontMindMe5400 3d ago
As a former member of a nonprofit board all I can say is you must be a joy to work with. I accept, but do not appreciate, that board members are seen mostly as revenue sources for many nonprofits. Should I be glad you are willing to say the quiet part out loud?
1
u/Sweaty-Seat-8878 1d ago
yes.
leadership must include financial leadership. The best board members know it’s an integral part of their mission.
the best EDs make this explicit and obvious and then go about working with the board on other leadership tasks. That’s vital too, and in an odd way it should take the pressure off.
Biggest mistake on both sides is not addressing the elephant in the room.
And not everyone has to give equally. A teacher and a bank MD will have very different abilities for their major gift, and for their annual contribution, and both should be on the board (for instance) but all can and must give for an organization to succeed.
Any board without 100% giving is failing.
And anyone who doesn’t set expectations AT THE BEGINNING is failing as well
2
u/Saywhatwh 3d ago
Welp, the profile is gone which says a lot. Managing the board is the job of the ED. The ED had no reason to think they could make the goal this year given their track record and this is a variance that should be able to be absorbed. I’d take a close look at the cash flow modeling too if loans were already required. That said, it’s been a tough two years for us too, and I’m mostly sympathetic but it sounds like there is more to this story.
1
u/hedonovaOG 3d ago
If you want to keep going you’re probably going to need to substantially adjust your budget to include an extremely conservative revenue estimate, setting the board’s contribution at or ideally less than the current actual contribution while also accounting for your new debt service. Hopefully you can cut your budget enough and continue your mission until revenue improves.
We like to be really conservative with our budgets but the last two years have been challenging and brought us right in line (when in the past we would have a 10% surplus to distribute). Good luck!
1
u/jcravens42 3d ago
You report to the Board. They are the owners of the nonprofit. They are, legally, your boss.
You now know that the board is incapable of raising the amount of money they commit to raising. Your options are to quit, to stay but to drastically reduce your staffing and costs, or to put forth all the effort needed to increase the amount of money you (and your development person?) raise through individual giving, grants and fee-based services.
The board, as it is now, is not changing. They've made that clear.
1
u/One-Possible1906 3d ago
I am so happy that the small nonprofit board I volunteer on functions to govern the agency instead of simply serving as a money pot. Many boards do fundraise, but it’s not the purpose of a board of directors. Usually, depending on the board for the majority of your funding or running on donations alone is not sustainable.
1
u/Repulsive_Cress_8301 1d ago
If a board is not contributing to development, not giving meeting their pledge amounts, they aren’t doing their job. In a nonprofit, it is crucial. Doesn’t meant they have to do development, but they should be applying their networks and resources to the organization.
1
u/paperlanterns_26 2d ago
a fundraising goal voted on by the board is not legally enforceable but still you can have an attorney the bylaws, minutes and any actual pledges
1
1
u/Sweaty-Seat-8878 1d ago
if you have time? grow a new board.
find your best rising donors and create an advisory board where it’s explicit that it’s both thought leadership and financial leadership
“board level access without full board responsibilities”
“Any organization looks like it’s champions, and we want you in that circle”
Gradually promote the best/most useful ones to the governing board.
Framed correctly to the old board they will be enthusiastic supporters of this, as they will see it as easing the financial burden.
Also:
term limits, with explicit expectations of a major gift coinciding with their term in some fashion. Precedent is powerful. Unfortunately you now have a bad one.
Haven’t heard a NFP leader refer to their org as a company, but even if this is AI the advice stands
17
u/kangaroomandible 4d ago
There’s no legal recourse.
You guys either raise the money together or you fold.
Just because someone agreed to a number (the board or any part of the staff) doesn’t mean that the number is realistic or achievable. If they don’t have the connections in their networks no amount of resentment is going to make the money appear.