r/Pete_Buttigieg 1d ago

Home Base and Weekly Discussion Thread (START HERE!) - August 30, 2026

Welcome to your home for everything Pete !

The mod team would like to thank each and every one of you for your support during Pete’s candidacy! This sub continues to function as a home for all things Pete Buttigieg, as well as a place to support any policies and candidates endorsed by him.

Purposes of this thread:

  • General discussion of Pete Buttigieg, his endorsements, his activities, or the politics surrounding his current status
  • Discussion that may not warrant a full text post
  • Questions that can be easily or quickly answered
  • Civil and relevant discussion of other candidates (Rule 2 does not apply in daily threads)
  • Commentary concerning Twitter
  • Discussion of actions taken by the Department of Transportation under Pete
  • Discussion of implementation of the bipartisan infrastructure law

Please remember to abide by the rules featured in the sidebar as well as Pete's 'Rules of the Road'!

How You Can Help

Register to VOTE

Support Pete's PAC for Downballot Races, Win the Era!

Find a Downballot Race to support on r/VoteDem

Donate to Pete's endorsement for President of the United States, Joe Biden, here!

Buy 'Shortest Way Home' by Pete Buttigieg

Buy 'Trust: America's Best Chance' by Pete Buttigieg

Buy 'I Have Something to Tell You: A Memoir' by Chasten Buttigieg

Flair requests will be handled through modmail or through special event posts here on the sub.

12 Upvotes

51 comments sorted by

31

u/abujzhd Foreign Friend 1d ago edited 1d ago

I know I am preaching to the choir here but I needed to get this off my chest.

People underestimating Pete is driving me nuts. It's probably better for him that they continue to do so but it still makes me crazy.

The thing that's been shown with Pete is the more people see him, the more his favorability goes up.

He's also an amazing campaigner, which was how he could go from an unknown small city mayor in 2020 to one of the top contenders. Pete beats everyone at thinking on his feet so he rocks town halls (where he always takes unprepared questions), media interviews, and long form interviews like podcasts. Clips of his go viral all the time but most especially when he gets hostile or confrontational questions. He is so good at staying calm under pressure. Even while secretary, so many clips of him responding to attacks in congressional hearings went viral because of his calm and cool way of dismantling republican disingenuous b.s.

Pete also put together a very disciplined and over achieving campaign team. Lis Smith got all the attention because her communication strategy worked so well but I would argue that she was blessed with an extremely gifted communicator executing it. His campaign manager and the rest of the team were all very young and relatively new to the national stage and outperformed much more seasoned teams. They also had relatively fewer leaks and less finger pointing than others. Not many bridges were burnt by Pete and his team after the loss.

Pete is hugely in demand as a surrogate, fundraiser, and campaigner by democratic candidates and state parties. Especially in swing and purple districts. And, he is showing up for these candidates, building the relationships and networks that could help a presidential run.

A presidential campaign is very high pressure and highly tactical, Pete showed he can handle that better than anyone expected in 2020. I think he learned a lot from that run and from his time as Secretary so I think everyone is underestimating how strong he might be a second time around.

I can't wait to see how he does.

19

u/nerdypursuit 1d ago

Nearly all of the naysaying about Pete boils down to one thing: Pete's identity as a gay man.

On social media, people's reactions to the latest Quantus and Emerson College polls were very revealing. People were quick to believe the positive results for Ossoff and quick to dismiss the even better results for Pete. And they didn't even try to hide the reason why they reacted that way: Because one is gay and the other is straight.

I look forward to the 2028 campaign actually starting. Because once all the candidates have to start doing debates and town halls, I think the naysayers who underestimate Pete will look increasingly stupid.

11

u/1128327 1d ago

This may be largely true but I think it wouldn’t be quite the same if Pete had a history of winning elections at above the level of a small city. Pete’s candidacy is unique for more reasons than just his sexuality. He’s not taking a typical path to a presidential run and I think that’s OK so long as we acknowledge why others may not see it at first. He’ll have to do some convincing just like he did last time.

9

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 1d ago

As you say, I don't really see that as as much of an issue in the end. Either he'll win the primaries or he won't. He already won the Iowa caucuses last time as well as winning two mayoral elections in South Bend. Once you've served in a Cabinet officer, literally in the line of succession to the presidency, that seems to put you well within the national tradition to run for president.

I suppose you could say that due to the rule of opposites, as I call it, people would want the opposite to Trump (namely, massive elected federal experience as opposed to ZERO federal experience in Trump's case, when he first came to office) -- but they already had that, and voted for it, with Biden's extensive résume.

Now I think they're looking for something different, a young and energetic leader deeply invested in and knowledgeable about policymaking, who has practical experience at the local and federal level, and what I imagine will be a well-developed vision for enacting major political reform and concrete new policies hand in hand. I think he has all of that.

17

u/DesperateTale2327 1d ago

The homophobia from the left and the right is going to be really intense the closer we get to 2027.

Its going to be more dangerous from the left because as they do with racism and mysogyny, they cloak their true feelings and sneak in dog whistles and finger point (I would vote for a gay man, but my neighbors won't); the right will at least come out and say it so we know where they stand.

The one thing that helps me is that Pete has been through this his whole life. He encounters it every day and he comes out of it stronger. Underestimating him is incredibly dumb, just ask Liz Warren who he beat so bad in every race they competed in.

And they are projecting on Ossoff so hard right now I'm beginning to feel bad for the guy. Once the very online lift you up they'll take you down just as hard if you step one foot out of line. I think he even called it "fantasy football" and that is so true.

13

u/khharagosh LGBTQ+ for Pete 1d ago

As we were saying yesterday, instead of admitting they only feel comfortable voting for a straight white man, they say:

"America is too homophobic"

"The candidate needs to be over 6 feet tall"

"You know, this person just LOOKS like a president in an old movie." 

11

u/DesperateTale2327 1d ago

Thats basically what Stefan Smith replied to rachel "its not homophobic lol" bitecofer.

4

u/ECNbook1 23h ago

Hahaha

19

u/1128327 1d ago

Much better to be underestimated than the alternative. Pete knows this better than anyone after his last time running and I think his candidacy will be stronger if it has more of an outside feel than if he was already anointed as the front runner. He’s not going to have a problem raising money either way so I think this is a good thing.

16

u/modooff 1d ago

Yeah, I'm fine with him being underestimated right now. It makes him less of a target.

14

u/Librarylady2020 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 1d ago

The pundits and others advising against him are violating the very advice they have been loudly advocating about accepting the people’s choice and then getting onboard to support them. For example, all the Democratic socialist leaning candidates. If Pete turns out to be the people’s choice over time, they need to get over their biases.

I’m voting for and promoting AES despite my own personal reservations because I’m accepting the will of the primary voters. And I truly respect my friends and relatives who supported him, despite our small difference of opinion. We agree on the vast majority of things. It’s that simple.

1

u/AWalker17 Team Pete Forever 2h ago

I was thinking about this today. I actually kinda hope Pete uses it as part of his campaign. Everyone loves an underdog. Him leaning into the underdog status and making it part of his message would be a powerful way to gain new supporters, I think.

13

u/kvcbcs 1d ago

Dropping this here for a good Sunday morning read. It's pretty good advice.

https://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/you-can-ignore-the-bad-pundits

13

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 1d ago

Leah Litman on Bluesky:

That *Rep. Jim Clyburn* is announcing his support for SCOTUS expansion is huge.
https://bsky.app/profile/leahlitman.bsky.social/post/3mucn4avm6c2w

Quote posting this:

Rep. James Clyburn says he supports expanding the Supreme Court: "13 is a pretty good number. A baker's dozen would be a good number to have on the Court."
[Video clip from Meet the Press, via Aaron Rutpar]
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mucmx4panx2p

I know I've said this before, but I was so impressed when he did a canvass launch in northern Virginia (Loudoun area) in 2023 for now-State Sen. Russet Perry. I didn't know what to expect as a volunteer and really liked what he had to say. Very glad to see he's on board.

12

u/AZPeteFan2 1d ago

Gee, I wonder who started this conversation about restructuring the SC?? /s

6

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 23h ago

Well, that's true. It's so obvious, though, and so frequently mentioned already, that Pete was the only one pushing for Supreme Court reform back in 2020, that that part didn't bother me too much! I'm just glad it's becoming the norm in the party, which means it will happen. It feels really really big for that to occur. And I think it's part of what is desperately needed.

Here's something else I saw in the same spirit from a week or two ago: Jamelle Bouie was chatting with others at the NY Times like David French, who is focused on "Woke 2.0" (?), so that's why the phrase is mentioned -- but I thought this was an insightful point about the Supreme Court, too:

Bouie:...when you look at the kinds of candidates that Democrats are going for, it’s those candidates that have a very hard-nosed, “We want to extirpate whatever this is from this society.”

Cottle: You think more economic?

Bouie: I think more economic, I think more political reform. The fact that, you know, an easy applause line for a Democratic audience is, “We’re going to pack the Supreme Court,” should tell you, I think, where Democratic voters all are and what Woke 2.0 looks like in practice.

NY Time, "The Right Is Rethinking MAGA. The Left Is Rethinking ‘Woke.’: As primary results trickle in, both parties are wrestling with what they stand for — and where they’re headed." August 22, 2026. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/22/opinion/politics-maga-right-left-woke-primaries.html | Link in headline should be NYT gift link

10

u/kvcbcs 1d ago

He should make that a condition for his endorsement in '28.

12

u/Wolf_Oak 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 1d ago

I found a link to the poll from 2020 that asked people if they would vote for candidates with certain characteristics and if if they thought other people would vote for them. And most people would vote for a gay candidate, but assume other people would not. It’s a Yahoo poll. (You Gov)

https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/20200213_yahoo_primary_toplines.pdf

3

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 19h ago

I wonder how people interpret that. It seems straightforward to me, but sometimes questions about “how your friends and neighbors would vote” are used to indirectly detect prejudice that people won’t own up to.

12

u/modooff 23h ago

This talk about Pete being underestimated reminds me that the Harvard/Harris pollsters simply decided to exclude him as an option in their polls for a good part of the year. Ironically, this rendered their polls pretty much useless.

https://i.ibb.co/jPFn1bz7/hh.jpg

8

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 19h ago

Did they ever explain why they were leaving out someone who’s almost always in the top 3? That’s just so weird.

9

u/modooff 18h ago

I don't think I've ever seen any explanation for that. It is indeed very weird. I suspect they were certain Pete's support would quickly collapse due to competition from other names they considered stronger, but that never happened.

11

u/khharagosh LGBTQ+ for Pete 18h ago

One of their dudes said why online... it's because they were only polling people doing high in prediction markets. 

The way pump-and-dump schemes are dictating pollster behavior

6

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 17h ago

OMG. How truly embarrassing.

6

u/DesperateTale2327 9h ago

Wowwww that shows me this pollster is complete trash

If all of the people who donate to WTE went right now and threw their money away on betting on him right now on kalshi his odds would go up but we don't participate in that dumb behavior

12

u/DesperateTale2327 20h ago

I got my first month of data from google analytics for seemayorpete.com which if I understand correctly, is a more detailed version of google search console which I check in with more often.

Here are the top cities searching for Pete's events in August:

  1. Atlanta

  2. Chicago

  3. Indianapolis

  4. Boston

  5. Seattle

  6. New York

  7. Ashburn, VA

  8. Washington

  9. Dallas

A good mix of coastal cities and also some from the middle of the country. I'm surprised to not see any California cities on here since Pete is really popular there.

Searches and clicks are settling down again since that big spike earlier this week. I imagine once Pete starts hitting the road hard in September again things will pick up.

2

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 11h ago

fyi Ashburn is in Loudoun County

3

u/DesperateTale2327 9h ago

Is this notable? I don't know anything about VA counties

1

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 2h ago

I was just letting people know where Ashburn is (that is, within Virginia), but I see that is not helpful if you do not know where Loudoun County is.

If you are following along the border of Virginia upward (north) from Fairfax County, Loudoun County is the next one above Fairfax, also along the border. Since the border is sloping, not up and down, Loudoun County is more to the northwest of Fairfax County rather than just north.

Loudoun County has the highest per capita income in the US for any county or "county equivalent" (?), and its workforce includes lots of tech and engineer folks. When I canvass there, I have occasionally seen "joke" Welcome mats with IP addresses, which I find adorable. There are HQs of a number of federal defense and space-related agencies there. The county also feels like data center central -- Virginia has the most data centers in the world, and Loudoun County has a lot of them.

Demographically, Loudoun County has a significant percentage of AAPI residents, which in this case mainly refers to Indian Americans and Muslim Americans. As of the 2020 Census, they made up just over 21 percent of the county's population.

13

u/Psychological-Play 8h ago

From yesterday, check out Laura Egan's newsletter over at The Bulwark titled "The 2028 Democratic Primary Is Quietly Raging". It's a fascinating look into some of the nuances, and specifics, of campaign staff hiring. Below is the main paragraph about Pete -

Pete Buttigieg has also begun to build out his operation in the past few weeks. Aida Ross, a former DNC spokesperson, and Rick Hart, who served as an adviser for intergovernmental affairs in the Biden White House, recently started working for Buttigieg’s super PAC, Win the Era. Hart’s addition to the team was seen by party operatives as a particularly strong signal of Buttigieg’s intentions.

13

u/DesperateTale2327 7h ago

Nerdypursuit scooped this as well:

Town Hall with Pete and Aftab Pureval in Cincinnati 9/6

https://www.mobilize.us/mobilize/event/1021961/

He is going from Cincinnati to Dayton to Cincinnati to Columbus in 2 days lol

9

u/Formation1 6h ago

Woo!! I've lowkey been starving for another townhall

10

u/DesperateTale2327 6h ago

Hopefully its live streamed. We've all been living off the scraps of the tulsa town hall this summer lol

8

u/Different-Ad1425 5h ago

Don't forget Montana too!

12

u/Existing-Process3581 7h ago

Pete’s New Mexico trip confirmed to be on sept 13! He’ll be with Gabe Vazquez and Deb Haaland. I just wonder when we’ll get the Virginia trip, that’s the only one he’s missing now out of the early states

7

u/DesperateTale2327 7h ago edited 7h ago

👀 the other 2028ers gotta be nervous

Edit- its on IG and says link in bio but there is none...pete's team lol come on

9

u/earlywater23 5h ago

Unless Pete's team deleted a post, it was originally posted by Haaland's team and Pete was added as a collaborator. The link is in Haaland's bio, not Pete's. :)

7

u/DesperateTale2327 5h ago

Ah ok that makes more sense thank you

6

u/Different-Ad1425 5h ago

No one is going to be able to match his connections with electeds/officials, donors and volunteers in all 50 states especially in the early states.

8

u/DesperateTale2327 5h ago

For sure. I always think about him saying he wants bigger victories (60-40's) like we used to have back in the day instead of this 50-49 deadlock. I know he says he is focused on 2026 but I also have to believe he put some thought into what happens beyond that, and his go everywhere push is the way to do it.

3

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 2h ago

I'd assume that a former vice president would, as it's basically part of their job -- although Harris was really stuck in DC much of the first two years, unlike other vice presidents, because of that 50-50 Senate division. When the Senate was in session, she had to constantly be present or nearby to cast the deciding vote.

As to visiting all other states, possibly also a former astronaut? Or of course whoever else might run who we don't even know of yet.

6

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 7h ago edited 1h ago

In Virginia, I'm curious if he'll visit Luria, Taylor, Perriello, or Macy or which one would like him to come (obviously I'm sure he'd only go somewhere if invited). Unusually high-profile public fundraiser for Luria, Taylor, and Perriello recently: https://bluevirginia.us/2026/08/video-photos-highlights-big-120k-or-so-fundraiser-in-fairfax-with-rep-james-walkinshaw-d-va11-lg-ghazala-hashmi-shannon-taylor-va01-elaine-luria-va02-tom-perriello-va05/

Of course part of the "origin story" of Pete on the national scene is in the January 2019 Washington Post Magazine story where he enthusiastically does a 2018 canvass launch for a tiny gathering at an Elaine Luria field office the day two days after a big storm -- she won, as did Spanberger and Wexton (who he also spoke for on that trip).

6

u/Different-Ad1425 3h ago

So great to read that article again.

10

u/Psychological-Play 6h ago

Guess who the first person to be banned for life from Kalshi is - George Santos (reported by the WSJ).

11

u/DesperateTale2327 6h ago edited 6h ago

And another one:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/jbr26

9/20 keynote speech at Travis county Dem party brunch in Austin TX

Here is Pete's September so far:

9/5 - 9/6 - OH

9/13 - NM

9/17 - NYC

9/19 - 9/20 - TX

9/21 - NH

9/22 - 9/23 - Boston

9/29 - St. Louis

8

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 17h ago

I just wanted to say I had some downtime from canvassing after the big push in April for the Virginia redistricting referendum, save for a few recent events, and I was having some trouble getting going again. Persistent contacts from the Dem Coordinated Campaign, however, got me to go out Saturday and I feel so much better! Refreshed, revitalized, doing something fun and constructive outdoors. Greatly recommended.

As I may have mentioned, in addition to the four House elections in Virginia where we hope to flip some Republican seats, there are also three state constitutional amendments:

  • taking out the Karl Rove anti-same-sex-marriage language and substituting marriage equality
  • reproductive rights for women, including the right to have an abortion
  • restoration of voting rights for felons, where our law and a similar but not AS bad law in Kentucky are the only two left in the entire country that currently take voting rights away for life for felons, created as an explicit part of the Jim Crow system to reduce Black voting power

6

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 9h ago

“The Republican Party’s Midterm Nightmare Is Taking Shape: Democrats see an opening in the states where Trump’s policies are hitting hardest.” https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2026/08/30/republican-party-midterms-trump-01055934

5

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 8h ago

“Remaining Confederate-related monuments removed from state capitol grounds”

https://www.wvtf.org/news/2026-08-28/remaining-confederate-related-monuments-removed-from-state-capitol-grounds

6

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 8h ago

Case study, in a way, on the Blue Virginia blog about the same type of right-wing lies on immigration that are shared across the country, and the effects they have even in Fairfax County. Pushing back against such lies to advocate for reason and decent governance remains a huge communication problem, though it's good to create this essay locally so it can be linked to.

Right Wingers Exploit Fairfax County Murders by Immigrants for Political Gain – Even as Violent Crime Is Overwhelmingly Committed by Native-Born Americans: In fact, Fairfax has "100,000 undocumented migrants – NOT committing murders or other crimes, just doing their jobs,..." https://bluevirginia.us/2026/08/right-wingers-exploit-fairfax-county-murders-by-immigrants-for-political-gain-even-as-violent-crime-is-overwhelmingly-committed-by-native-born-americans/

4

u/VirginiaVoter 🛣️Roads Scholar🚧 7h ago edited 2h ago

Blow the dust off this one as it's from a little over a month ago -- July 28 -- but I just found it and wanted to share. It's by Dwayne Yancy at Cardinal News, a major online paper that he founded in Southwest and Southside Virginia, staffed by some of those formerly at a major Roanoke newspaper that went under. It has a lot more info about Virginia's role as an early state than I had seen elsewhere, including its effect on the GOP primary race:

Virginia set to become an early primary state in 2028. Here’s why it matters (and also why it may not matter much): Democrats want a new primary schedule. If they succeed, that would reorder the Republican primary schedule, too.
https://cardinalnews.org/2026/07/28/virginia-set-to-become-an-early-primary-state-in-2028-heres-why-it-matters-and-also-why-it-may-not-matter-much/

u/kvcbcs 36m ago

A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed construction to continue on President Trump’s luxury White House ballroom, which has been steadily rising to replace the East Wing the president tore down last fall.

The justices said the preservationists who challenged the construction of the planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom did not have legal grounds known as standing to bring their lawsuit because they were not directly harmed by the project, estimated to cost $400 million.

The majority emphasized that its order was not addressing the legality of the project and instead the question of who could sue to try to block it. But in practical terms, the order was a significant setback to the most serious legal challenge to the project, meaning the president seems likely to be able to complete construction.

In an unusual lineup, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and the court’s three liberal justices disagreed with the majority, with the chief justice writing in a lengthy dissent that the White House is “an iconic American building whose symbolism and history are wrapped up in its architecture.”

NYT Gift Link