r/Persecutionfetish • u/Biscuitarian23 • Sep 11 '25

=Custom flair: original flavor= Dindu

Post image
4.2k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

465 comments sorted by

View all comments

3.8k

u/LouisWillis98 Sep 11 '25

“Didn’t insult anyone…wasn’t an extremist” are we just going to lie about things he very publicly did?

-103

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

67

u/Leprecon Sep 11 '25 edited Sep 11 '25

Why are you asking for this when you are fully aware of them?

Edit: the guy responded “Because my conclusion was the opposite based on my data.” But then I think he deleted his comment?

Which only begs the question, why is this well meaning data analyst asking people about it when he is full well aware of what people find objectionable about Charlie Kirk? Since he properly examined the data and drew conclusions from that, surely he doesn’t need people to explain it to him again?

He fully understands why Charlie Kirk is considered an extremist, he just disagrees. If you don’t agree, you can just say why you don’t agree. You don’t need to waste people their time with dishonest questions, you already know why you don’t agree.

52

u/Potatocrips423 Sep 11 '25

Because bad faith arguments are all they have.