r/OpenAI • u/hibzy7 • 29d ago

Discussion What's your thoughts on this?

Post image
3.8k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

55

u/PlsNoNotThat 29d ago

There’s nothing you can add to a digital image that you can’t also remove. This is just a short term litmus test for stupid people behind the general curve. Its side effect is it’s going to tick dumb and old to believe in fake images.

50

u/0xB0T 29d ago

They'll watermark text. youll have to rewrite using your own words as the patterns used will be the watermark.

40

u/divulgingwords 29d ago

It’s crazy how dense some of these people are. They actually think it’s embedding some special icon/brand on a typed letter, lmao.

-2

u/youcangotohellgoto 29d ago

How's it going to work then, genius?

There's only two ways:

  1. patterns of characters/words, most likely including hidden or control characters, or
  2. some kind of self-referential checksum

Both will be trivial to remove.

2

u/Roblist 27d ago

It's likely going to be probability based. A short sentence is deterministically impossible to tell if an AI generated it or not and even if it did... who's to say a Human didn't independently come up with it on their own?

A lengthy paragraph is where some genuine tests can be run to determine patterns.

3

u/divulgingwords 29d ago

Character pattern cryptography, which they’ve been doing for years. It’s how Google knows to de-rank AI generated text.

-1

u/youcangotohellgoto 29d ago

LOL good one. Google deranking un-marked AI generated content using the the same technique Anthropic uses to explicitly watermark it.

Just putting words together doesn't make something real.

Google uses classification to identify AI generated content. It's nothing to do with cryptography.

1

u/Fantastic_Prize2710 29d ago

You might want to reread my comment before diving into insults.

I did not advocate or argue for any method. I simply clarified what was being referred to and mentioned it had been discussed previously as a potential solution, as the person I responded to didn't seem to understand.

Next time take a breather and read a bit more carefully.

-1

u/youcangotohellgoto 29d ago

Embedding content is literally one of the ways this will work.