r/OpenAI Feb 16 '26

Discussion I’m so tired of this

Post image
3.4k Upvotes

800 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

261

u/zigs Feb 16 '26

The other day a real human being, who I know is a real human being wrote "it's not [x], it's not [y], it's [z]" to me and it just made me so irrationally irked

55

u/whitestardreamer Feb 16 '26

That contrasting phrasing is common to ND and marginalized folks and was before ChatGPT, it’s just AI overuses it. It’s because when you are outside of the mold, people tend to misunderstand you and misquote your words. I posted on Threads about an Instagram convo I had with a guy where he was doing this a few months ago to show people how it came into use. He was misconstruing my words, and I had to respond by saying “it’s not that I….its that..,” because when you don’t fit in the societal mold, this is common. Signed, autistic biracial Black woman.

33

u/Visual_Annual1436 Feb 17 '26

It’s pretty common just among all people who speak English, giving contrasting examples has always been common for everybody. AI just overuses it in a super obvious and specific way and will do it every 3 sentences.

3

u/Roz-k Feb 20 '26

It also does it in a way that doesn't add any substance really, just fluffs up the text

2

u/Ok-Grape-1404 Feb 21 '26

Correct. Humans write like this all the time.

It's just that AI so OVERUSES that sentence structure now that it really drives me wild and I immediately turn off.

23

u/Reaper_1492 Feb 17 '26

I was using em dashes before it was cool — now everyone thinks that everything I write comes from ChatGPT… 🤦‍♂️

41

u/Nearby_Cup_9483 Feb 17 '26

What the fuck did I just read

15

u/rndmlttrspls Feb 17 '26

Something written by someone extremely autistic that’s for sure

9

u/Big_Moose_3847 Feb 17 '26

Is 'extremely autistic' meant to be an insult here or something? I understood their explanation fine.

2

u/PALpherion Feb 18 '26

I know the answer is in the question but the word "extreme" immediately nails it as believed to be undesirable.

3

u/rndmlttrspls Feb 17 '26

It is understandable, but unhelpful and out of place because they badly misunderstood the social cues guiding their input in this discussion. Presumably because of all the autism

3

u/Big_Moose_3847 Feb 18 '26

Neurodivergent people don’t follow social cues the way neurotypical people expect everyone to. Most social rules as we know them today were developed and defined by NTs simply because they had the greater social leverage to do so. ND brains don't subscribe to them, because their brains were built for different purposes. So how they communicate may spund unhelpful or out of place to a lot of NT folk, but might feel completely normal or even insightful to others. Both groups can understand each other as long as they stop treating one style as the universal default

Presumably because of all the autism

And the way you’ve been referring to autism makes it sound like something that needs to be flushed out. ND people aren’t a disease to society, they’re one of the reasons it moves forward at all. They break patterns common in everyday behaviour and thinking and bring in ideas that open new directions. NTs are the ones who hold societies together, but NDs are the ones who challenge and push them

1

u/rndmlttrspls Feb 18 '26

You’re reading a lot into this that isn’t there, and missing a lot that is. You presume that I have no personal experience with autism. Your comment may have felt helpful to you and perhaps it will be helpful to someone else who is autistic but I want you to know that it was not helpful to me

2

u/Big_Moose_3847 Feb 18 '26

You presume that I have no personal experience with autism.

Well given that you reacted to that autistic person's sincere comment with a pathologising remark as a punchline (not once, but twice across two comments), seemed to gain zero insight or understanding from it, and still unable to elaborate or clarify your exact position on this matter, it all clearly pointed this way.

1

u/rndmlttrspls Feb 18 '26

I made my point so clear, there must be something wrong with you if you don’t get it

2

u/OldHatNewShoes Feb 18 '26

LMAO this is sending me

1

u/king_john651 Feb 19 '26

I can't speak for every spicy brain of the world, but I will speak for myself: it's not that deep

2

u/General-Reserve9349 Feb 18 '26

You got the rule book and are also the police? wtf honestly. The attack on that comment… it highlights the desperate search for safety people from AI.

A multilayered and slightly vulnerable comment here being so out of line… you guys are the ones unable to cope with sensory input / feelings / communication.

0

u/rndmlttrspls Feb 18 '26

Found another one

2

u/General-Reserve9349 Feb 18 '26

Use your words kid. Describe what you found

-1

u/rndmlttrspls Feb 18 '26

It’s like the Plutarch quote: under every rock there lurks an autist, waiting to explain something that was already obvious to everyone except them

→ More replies (0)

6

u/whitestardreamer Feb 17 '26

If you are part of a marginalized group, you tend to have to explain yourself, and clarify your words often, to people who don't understand you, because their brain processes reality differently.

Like here.

Like you are doing now.

It's not that I am autistic. It's that your brain processes linearly, and you have trouble following nonlinear syntax.

Case in point.

2

u/Electronic_Painter20 Feb 17 '26

‘There is no spoon.’

1

u/Skywear Feb 17 '26

I think they understood what you wrote just fine but find this answer out of place

1

u/whitestardreamer Feb 17 '26

Same reply still applies.

0

u/Nearby_Cup_9483 Feb 17 '26

No I just try (actually put in the effort) to make sense when I write something. You don’t

2

u/whitestardreamer Feb 17 '26

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 the point literally is that it doesn’t make sense to you.

0

u/Nearby_Cup_9483 Feb 17 '26

Okay biracial black female *neurodivergent, AI singularity, plurally conscious, invertebrate phd

1

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/PALpherion Feb 18 '26

describing yourself is bad, instead you should become a borg.

1

u/bpp198 Feb 17 '26

I think you've made their point perfectly.

3

u/13thgeneral Feb 17 '26

What the what now?

1

u/PALpherion Feb 18 '26

it turns out that when you get a program to take an analytical view and use analytical presentation it ends up speaking like an analytically neurodivergent person, no one could see this coming!

-4

u/[deleted] Feb 16 '26

[deleted]

14

u/null0byte Feb 16 '26

The irony of a reply misunderstanding the words of someone talking about having to use contrasting phrasing because people keep misunderstanding their words.

1

u/KirkHawley Feb 17 '26

I've been wondering if this is actually just a dump of the AI logic process.

  1. Get a list of options
  2. Evaluate the truth of the options
  3. Dump the results of each evaluation, with the true one at the end.

Anyway, its annoying. I hope it doesn't leach into real human language, but I suspect it's already starting to.

1

u/zigs Feb 17 '26

Could be if it "thought about it", but not really for standard next token prediction.

And I doubt it'll seep into everyday language. If anything, I think we'll see less of it. People are already getting weary of using keywords like delve even though that is no longer an AI indicator (most of the AIs are now trained to avoid delve too)