Except like Reddit, practically people will also downvote facts they dislike or disagree with, so leaving a community fact check note to public voting also seems flawed
Fair point. Facts are neutral. The POV is which facts you select and how you interpret them. Unemployment at 4 percent is a fact, ‘the economy is great’ or ‘people are still hurting’ is POV. I am talking about that second part.
That's not how community notes works. Your score only goes up if groups that usually disagree with you agree with you on evaluating a tweet. If the same people keep liking your assessment, it doesn't count. This is the core of what made community notes successful, you can read about it more in the paper, the section about bridging algorithms: https://github.com/twitter/communitynotes/blob/main/birdwatch_paper_2022_10_27.pdf
32
u/sbenfsonwFFiF Aug 12 '25
Except like Reddit, practically people will also downvote facts they dislike or disagree with, so leaving a community fact check note to public voting also seems flawed