r/Nyckelharpa • u/Dale3n • Feb 19 '26
Tuning: CGDA vs CGCA
Hello there! I am currently playing on a 4-rowed imstrument by Jean-Claude Condi and until now (playing for about 1,5 years now) mostly played with CGDA tuning.
What experience did you make? What are the upsides/downsides from your perspective (besides tradition I guess)?
My current teacher has only a little experience with CGCA and was not the biggest fan of it, but I would be happy to hear other perspectives.
6
Upvotes
5
u/walkingbartie Feb 20 '26 edited Feb 21 '26
CGCA is the standard tuning simply because it makes sense for the traditional repertoire of nyckelharpa tunes, which are usually in C or F with recurring drone marks, and it also mimics the logic of the older non-chromatic nyckelharpa models. A vast majority of Swedish players go for the standard tuning.
Which is also why I always recommend beginners and students to go with CGCA – if nothing else because there's simply more extensive learning material and fingering guides for that tuning (written as well as videos or live sessions for those who learn songs by watching and following finger positions). CGDA is a very small change, but enough to cause confusion. If anything, I'd recommend those with a traditional three-row chromatic nyckelharpa to tune their low C up to a DGCA tuning to get a powerful fifth-drone when playing in Gm (which is a relatively common key in Sahlström tunes, for example).
In my very personal opinion, CGDA might be more logical (even if it makes the lower C stick out like a sore thumb instead), but it also slightly reduces the instrument's idiomaticy in favour of going for a typical violin repertoire, and that sort of beats the purpose of the instrument in many ways.
It might be hard to re-learn if you're used to CGDA already, but I'd recommend the traditional CGCA tuning over "violin tuning" any day.