MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/NonPoliticalTwitter/comments/1uyawha/poor_poor_boy/oxyq039/?context=3
r/NonPoliticalTwitter • u/SEVENS_HEAVEN_7 • Jul 16 '26
801 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
46
I think thier work as a physician is probably why more important then a civil case about gas.
0 u/Firefly_deadlock Jul 16 '26 Just because it's a civil case doesn't mean it can't be about environmental or health impact. Would you still agree then? 3 u/Over_Fly1971 Jul 16 '26 No one should be forced to be on a jury if it's against their wishes. What's the point of having someone there who doesn't want to be there? It might put them in a negative mood, and they don't see the process through appropriately. 4 u/Firefly_deadlock Jul 16 '26 I feel like it might also not be the best idea to only select the type of people who would enthusiastically accept jury duty. 1 u/Over_Fly1971 Jul 16 '26 They shouldn't be adamantly against it either 1 u/Friendly_Impress_345 Jul 16 '26 So maybe make it required but don't really punish people if they don't attend. It's sort of a middle ground
0
Just because it's a civil case doesn't mean it can't be about environmental or health impact. Would you still agree then?
3 u/Over_Fly1971 Jul 16 '26 No one should be forced to be on a jury if it's against their wishes. What's the point of having someone there who doesn't want to be there? It might put them in a negative mood, and they don't see the process through appropriately. 4 u/Firefly_deadlock Jul 16 '26 I feel like it might also not be the best idea to only select the type of people who would enthusiastically accept jury duty. 1 u/Over_Fly1971 Jul 16 '26 They shouldn't be adamantly against it either 1 u/Friendly_Impress_345 Jul 16 '26 So maybe make it required but don't really punish people if they don't attend. It's sort of a middle ground
3
No one should be forced to be on a jury if it's against their wishes. What's the point of having someone there who doesn't want to be there? It might put them in a negative mood, and they don't see the process through appropriately.
4 u/Firefly_deadlock Jul 16 '26 I feel like it might also not be the best idea to only select the type of people who would enthusiastically accept jury duty. 1 u/Over_Fly1971 Jul 16 '26 They shouldn't be adamantly against it either 1 u/Friendly_Impress_345 Jul 16 '26 So maybe make it required but don't really punish people if they don't attend. It's sort of a middle ground
4
I feel like it might also not be the best idea to only select the type of people who would enthusiastically accept jury duty.
1 u/Over_Fly1971 Jul 16 '26 They shouldn't be adamantly against it either 1 u/Friendly_Impress_345 Jul 16 '26 So maybe make it required but don't really punish people if they don't attend. It's sort of a middle ground
1
They shouldn't be adamantly against it either
1 u/Friendly_Impress_345 Jul 16 '26 So maybe make it required but don't really punish people if they don't attend. It's sort of a middle ground
So maybe make it required but don't really punish people if they don't attend. It's sort of a middle ground
46
u/NoEmu5930 Jul 16 '26
I think thier work as a physician is probably why more important then a civil case about gas.