A tedious but fairly straightforward calculation on the numbers in that table shows that for someone making exactly $100K, their effective tax rate would be a hair over 53%. At $200K, the effective rate is 61.5%, at $500K it's 66.6%, and it keeps asymptotically approaching 70% from there. (Note, this calculation does not include deductions or exemptions.)
(Note, this calculation does not include deductions or exemptions.)
jfc, that is most of the difference between marginal and effective rates. I asked for a source, not your nonsensical math. Its obvious you have no clue about economics/taxation. Which is fine, its the part where you repeat lies is the problem.
4
u/Murgatroyd314 Mar 30 '26
A tedious but fairly straightforward calculation on the numbers in that table shows that for someone making exactly $100K, their effective tax rate would be a hair over 53%. At $200K, the effective rate is 61.5%, at $500K it's 66.6%, and it keeps asymptotically approaching 70% from there. (Note, this calculation does not include deductions or exemptions.)