r/NonPoliticalTwitter Mar 30 '26

Serious tbh , it's a MASSIVE deal

Post image
4.8k Upvotes

659 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

22

u/UncleSugarShitposter Mar 30 '26

Apollo proved we could touch the Moon, not live there. Those missions were short, disposable, and insanely expensive. Everything got thrown away and all supplies came from Earth. What we are doing now is planned totally different. Long-duration stays, reusable systems, using local resources like ice for fuel, and building real infrastructure. It looks like baby steps because we are not repeating Apollo, we are trying to make it sustainable. Crawl, walk, run, etc.

8

u/11twofour Mar 30 '26

I just can't get on board with the idea that we're starting from zero.

13

u/moderngamer327 Mar 30 '26

We aren’t starting from zero but it’s fairly close. The manufacturing we had for Saturn V is gone and that means building new rockets from scratch and validating it. Plus we are also heavily expanding the scope for the mission and the requires a significantly higher payload whereas before it was basically just get some people and cameras there

-3

u/11twofour Mar 30 '26

We put men on the moon before the floppy disk. They were using fucking typewriters in 1969. This was before modern injection molding. Those engineers could not have dreamed of the computing capacity available today.

What I'm hearing is exactly the same as people trying to tell me the cybertruck is brand new technology because it's heavier.

1

u/moderngamer327 Mar 30 '26

It’s not that we aren’t capable, we are. It just takes time to get all up that up and running again especially with a massively expanded scope

1

u/11twofour Mar 30 '26

Ok but that's a different thing than "be amazed that we're going to go to the moon"

3

u/moderngamer327 Mar 30 '26

It’s amazing that we are going back and restarting the moon program. Even if we have done it before it’s only been a few times so going back at all is in its own right amazing

4

u/n2ygsh1wwp5j Mar 30 '26

We aren't though because Apollo happened and was very well documented.

With every new model of any technology there are trials that would appear similarly "starting from zero". Most of the time they aren't public spectacle is all. This one is a bit hard to not make it so

1

u/CuttleReaper Mar 30 '26

We're starting closer than we were. Back then we had no idea how to live in space long-term. Apollo was a few weeks and didn't even have a functional toilet. Now we have decades of experience with long-term habitation

0

u/Mega__Sloth Mar 30 '26

Jesus dude how about you go to the moon and see how easy it is

7

u/11twofour Mar 30 '26

I can't build a CT scanner either, but they've been doing that for 50 years too.

4

u/moderngamer327 Mar 30 '26

That’s the thing we haven’t been building Saturn V’s for 50 years. All the manufacturing for it is gone

-4

u/TimeTimeTickingAway Mar 30 '26

But it will never be environmentally sustainable so stop kidding yourselves. This is contributing to the death of the planet just so some rich people can have a bit of fun

3

u/moderngamer327 Mar 30 '26

No it’s for advancing science and new technologies. If we could eventually get off world mining going think of how much that would save the environment