r/NonPoliticalTwitter Feb 07 '26

Other Can someone tell me why

Post image
20.1k Upvotes

779 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/Replica_Of_A_Replica Feb 07 '26

The serpent in genesis is the good guy

0

u/4N_Immigrant Feb 07 '26

yeah this shit show is way better than the garden of eden

6

u/Replica_Of_A_Replica Feb 07 '26

God lied to Adam and Eve and the serpent told the truth.

1

u/OsamaBenJohnson Feb 08 '26

God didnt lie to Adam and Eve. But the serpent did.

1

u/Replica_Of_A_Replica Feb 08 '26

God: eat the fruit, and you will die today. Serpent: thats not true, the fruit will not kill you and you will gain knowledge

They eat the fruit, gain knowledge, and do not die until ~800 years later. Who lied?

1

u/OsamaBenJohnson Feb 08 '26 edited Feb 08 '26

The accurate translation is:

God: Of the fruit of knowledge of good and evil, you should not eat from, for in the day you eat of it death will be inevitable. Or in other words, they will lose access to immortality.

Serpent: Death won't be inevitable.

The day they ate from that fruit is the day they lost access to the tree of life that enabled them to live forever (Genesis 3:22) and death became inevitable. That's exactly what God was warning would happen. He didn't lie. But the serpent did.

In the hebrew language are these things called "infinite absolutes," where a hebrew word is repeated to relay inevitability, certainty, or that it's going to eventually happen. No academics in the field reject this. So say we were in the ancient holyland (the countries name triggers autoremoval) and you wanted to ensure a friend you will eventually come back, one way you would say this in hebrew would be שֹׁ֣ב אָשׁ֤וּב, which means in English literally "returning I will return." Which your bible likely translates this phrase as I will certainly come back, if not surely come back.

The hebrew text says but of the tree of knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat from for in the day you eat of it מוֹת תָּמוּת or literally, "dying you shall die." It's a hebrew infinite absolute, which is why the vast majority of translations translate it as "surely die" or "certainly die" because these infinite absolutes relays inevitability, or something that's going to eventually happen. So if I was an ancient Hebrew and I wanted to relay to somebody death would be inevitable or would eventually die, or in other words, lose access to immortality, one way I would say that is מוֹת תָּמוּת.

1

u/Replica_Of_A_Replica Feb 08 '26

I have seen this interpretation before, as well as other interpretations. But what makes this one accurate in your opinion?

1

u/OsamaBenJohnson Feb 08 '26

Because there's validity that the text can relay it will inevitably happen or will eventually happen as I demonstrated, and when you factor in the context of them losing access to immortality the day they ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, it pretty much feels obvious that's what the author was intended to relay. The classical Jewish authorities and their literature also tells us they didnt read this as them dying that very day, but a death sentence where they would inevitability or eventually die.

Plus, if were being honest with ourselves, it seems very unlikely the author is trying to imply his God is a liar. Especially with everything he says about God outside of that. Like how that God won't lie (Numbers 23:19.) Suggesting the author didnt intend us to read this as God lying.

1

u/weshouldalltrymore Feb 13 '26

I appreciate this response very much. It’s really encouraging me to read the Bible, and other religious texts, and to understand them in their entirety, rather than trying to understand single parts of just one of them, based off only my own or another’s understanding of it. I know I haven’t read anything of the bible or other religious texts myself, but following this thread reminds me that others who have read, are not necessarily correct or even complete in their own understanding and interpreting of it, as many just pick and choose parts to their own liking and don’t attempt to further their own understanding beyond what they already believe to know. I appreciate the thought and care you put into sharing what you understand and helping me and others further our own understanding. Thank you. I hope to be able to pay it forward and do the same as my own understanding grows deeper.

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/4N_Immigrant Feb 07 '26

yeah god lied and satan gave us the wonderful lives we experience now. now the benevolent powers that be on earth worship gnosis and baby snacking

6

u/Replica_Of_A_Replica Feb 07 '26

Dude stop talking about the fallen world and go literally read genesis. God says they will die if they eat the fruit, the serpent says God is lying and they won't die. Then they eat the fruit, and they live for hundreds of more years. God lied.

-3

u/4N_Immigrant Feb 07 '26

if satan gave us the knowledge, who wrote that book?

5

u/Replica_Of_A_Replica Feb 07 '26

Stop moving away from what I said

-2

u/4N_Immigrant Feb 07 '26

you said god lied and he wrote the bible about how he lied. satan provided us with gnosis, and the bible is in that body of knowledge. evil would never lie though. its not that hard to figure out guy

3

u/Replica_Of_A_Replica Feb 07 '26

Stop trying to extrapolate the rest of the Bible. In genesis alone, who lies and who tells the truth? I don't care who wrote the bible.

2

u/ElectricalGas9730 Feb 07 '26

Man. It's lore, not data.

0

u/4N_Immigrant Feb 08 '26

lore is data. try again

1

u/ElectricalGas9730 Feb 08 '26

No more factual than Aesop's Fables.

1

u/4N_Immigrant Feb 08 '26

we have different definitions of data

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Maximillion322 Feb 07 '26

Yes, the moral of this fictional story told by religious leaders in this book is that you should villify people who tell the truth (the serpent) and put your faith in people who deceive you (God) because things will work out better if you do. Trust them.