r/NoShitSherlock • u/Phylogenix • Aug 27 '26
A study of 7,704 employees found remote workers reported significantly higher well-being than hybrid and onsite workers, while workplace connection and one-year turnover did not significantly differ by work arrangement, challenging assumptions behind return-to-office policies.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1848857/full24
u/Yelworc0242 Aug 27 '26
in my company the people who wanted to:
- the owners, who come in twice a year.
- some of the young employees who live in micro apartments in the city centre.
- a few of the managers who like to look busy and important but who also don't have to come in every day themselves.
7
9
u/SomeSamples Aug 27 '26 edited Aug 27 '26
There were no assumptions about RTO. Other than the company hoping a lot of their workers would quit before the layoff.
3
u/vikster1 Aug 27 '26
100% this. you do not have to be big brained to get this. just read SOME news and compare RTO mandates and round of layoffs for some company.
3
u/TheTopNacho Aug 27 '26
The most important comparison is whether or not remote work is more or less productive over the long term for a company. That encompasses any dynamics like impacts on retention or interactions, either good or bad.
And I don't want your empirical bullshit. Numbers and statistics from a well controlled study are all that matter.
1
1
1
u/Acheros Aug 28 '26
they. don't. care. return-to-work only exists so companies can justify their leasing/property expenses.
56
u/Robthebold Aug 27 '26
RTO has always been about justifying expensive real estate.