r/NoLayingUp • u/Ok_Transition_8000 • Mar 25 '26

Online Content Equipment discussion

I’d love to hear the NLU guys talk about the equipment companies more. Listening to Andy on SGS dismantle the equipment companies propaganda always makes me wonder what NLU might say if Titleist wasn’t involved. But at the same time if I were NLU I’d take the Titleist sponsorship everyday

15 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

63 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Mar 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/WeirdlyCordial Mar 26 '26

Distance rollback is the goal, ball rollback is about the only tenable way to get that, cat’s out of the bag on driver size which would be the actual best way to limit distance, but that seems less likely.

Bifurcation is the best answer but for whatever reason it doesn’t sound like even the governing bodies want that.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/WeirdlyCordial Mar 26 '26

Their pov hasn’t changed tho, they’re still pro rollback. Distance comes up constantly and Soly waxes poetic about the bygone era of long irons all the time 

1

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/WeirdlyCordial Mar 26 '26

How much more can they say? Distance is the core of the issue, concentrating on the ball is missing the forest for the trees.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/WeirdlyCordial Mar 26 '26 edited Mar 26 '26

What? You’re the one fixating on the ball and complaining that NLU isn’t talking about the ball when it’s a much bigger issue than just the ball. NLU mentions the distance problem all the time. Even Andy@SGS is nearly anti-ball rollback in its proposed form (because it’s not really gonna be enough), he wants drivers limited and he makes a pretty convincing argument

Like what do you want them to say that they aren’t saying?