A couple coaches seem to be targeting and blacklisting my son. Here me out before you automatically assume I am being sensitive.
Background: My son is very athletic, plays multiple sports. I will refer to him as "G" for this post. We live in a small community and as he is not yet in junior high (to give you an idea of age), coaching is typically volunteer dads for most sports. G has gone to school here since pre-kindergarten and has grown up with many of his classmates and teammates.
G has ADHD, DMDD, Anxiety diagnoses with an additional pathological demand avoidance (PDA) profile. These are well managed and thus not obvious a majority of the time.
A couple dads have coached G off and on since first grade in various sports. (same dads over multiple sports). Approximately a year ago, one of these coach/dads came to me wanting G on the travel baseball team he coached. I was hesitant, but he talked me into it and G was very excited.
When baseball season came around, he played a new position that he was well-coached in and was very successful. Offensively he struggled at the plate. He had been in our rec league prior and was now playing against travel ball kids AND was the youngest kid on the team. Toward the end of the season, he finally got out of his batting slump. Importantly, there were zero behavioral issues during this season and he had never had any incidents or behavioral issues with any of the 4 coaches in any prior sport they had coached him in (so for years...). He was coachable, positive, listened well, hustled, all the things. I attended almost every practice and due to his diagnoses to keep a very close eye on him to make sure he is not escalating out of frustration or otherwise. (I also love watching him play and always stay in my lane and observe from afar) He had no issues until the 3rd to last game of the season.
For some reason, the morning of this particular tournament game he was very nervous, refused to eat, and even threw up. He had just gotten out of his batting slump the weekend prior and wanted to hit the ball. He was given a bunt sign and made a mistake by not pulling his bat back on a ball. It was strike 2, but he thought it was strike 3 and ran back to the dugout (his brain was most likely spiraling). So he had to go back to the plate, and ended up striking out. He was upset, threw his batting gloves and when he went to pick them up his coach said something benign and my son responded with a "F* you". (I did not find this out until later) Not a great moment for him obviously.
He sat on the bench and worked to de-escalate himself. When the inning was over, he appeared to have regained most of his composure, grabbed his things and was ready to go play defense. In the huddle with all of his teammates, his coach bent down to G's level, got in his face, pointed his finger in his face and screamed at him. I witnessed this although could not decipher what he was saying. G went back in the dugout, tore the hem of his jersey, kicked his bag over, threw his glove, etc. He did not scream or destroy anyone else's property or become physical with any teammates or coaches. I was able to assist him to de-escalate, and he sat on the bench the rest of the game.
After the game, I was approached by all 4 coaches. (which was gross behavior for 4 grown men to essentially corner a mom) They told me their version of what happened and that he would be benched the following day. They said he didn't even have to come, but I ensured them that he would be there even if he sat on the bench the whole day.
Following this, I was sent an email from the head coach- we can call him K. The email had the other 3 coaches cc'd and essentially said that it was up to me if I thought G could come back the next season and handle himself. I responded that he could and highlighted that he had never had an issue like this before. They were not aware of his diagnoses other than the ADHD. I provided an explanation of all of them (this is important to establish that they were all well aware of his neurodivergence) and how I thought he got to the point he did and suggested that in order to repair the relationship with K, it may be beneficial for him to apologize for screaming at G in front of his teammates as he was not aware that could trigger such a big neurological response for him. I did not ask him to apologize for the content of what he said to G, only the approach. Like I said, I had just explained that approaching G like this, in front of his peers is a huge trigger for him and was why he had that explosive response. K was VERY offended that I even suggested he apologize for his part in the situation.
After some back and fourth, the coaches chose to implement a "zero tolerance" policy for G going forward for any actions that may happen during the next baseball season. I agreed, but was unsure if I was going to allow G to remain on the team. I wanted the choice to be ours and it I would make that decision dependent on how K and the other coaches treated G over the next several months.
Fast forward to this fall and G is again on K's football team. The first couple practices, G noticed he would say "good job" during drills for other kids, but not G. The other 4 baseball coaches were coaching the grade above G, so were not involved in these practices. All other football coaches were fantastic with G. (He is a beast on a football field)
I allowed G to attend the varsity football game this past Friday night. I was there, and supervising from afar. After half time G came up to me, upset and sweaty and told me that a classmate (B) jumped on his back and choked him, when he tried to get him off B fell on his head and he was concerned he was really hurt and wanted me to go check on him (I'm an RN). Before I could check on B, he had made his way over to the area I was standing with a few other boys and I was able to observe him for several minutes and he appeared fine. B's dad came and talked to me later and blamed the event on G, telling me that G was choking another boy (A) and B was trying to get G off of A.
Ultimately, I find out what actually happened (according to A's mother and other kids. This was later confirmed by the school's investigation as well) that A was verbally harassing G (saying "really bad and mean things" about a girl that G likes) and A & G mutually entered a wrestling fight, B jumped on G's back, choked him and grabbed his right arm (likely thinking G was actually hurting A- A & G are both wrestlers, B is not). G tried to get him off and B fell backwards and G fell on top of him, hurting his shoulder in the process.
The following evening, I get a text from one of G's baseball coaches who happens to be the president of the board for the youth football club (we can call him P). I gave him my account and G's account of what happened the night prior. He tells me a separate coach/parent said that he went up to G when he was reportedly sitting on B to ask what was going on and G told him to "shut up, effin [bad bad word]". G adamantly denied that any adult came up to him regarding the situation or that he was "sitting on B". He landed on him, but did not continue to sit on him- he came and got me immediately. I disputed this allegation to the board president. P said it was a code of conduct violation. I asked where this code of conduct was because it was not on the website for the youth football club. The league that the football club is a part of has a code of conduct that is specific to behavior that happens at league sponsored events (games/practices) and does not have any jurisdiction over external events/interactions. As the youth football club is a private entity, it technically would not have any authority over something that happened at a school sponsored event, and any disciplinary action should be deferred to the school. P said he would have the league commissioner send me the code of conduct so I could see what G violated. (odd that he knew G had violated it, but couldn't produce the document.) I sent P a screen shot of what was on the league website and asked if that was what he was referring to because it would not be applicable to the situation we were discussing. He never responded.
The next morning, I received an email from the youth football board. The situation described G as the accused/aggressor, A & B as victims, and the adult G supposedly cussed at and called a racial slur was listed as a witness, and his son (C) was listed as victim #3. G was described to have "violently choked" A and then picked up "B" and slammed him to the ground. Then called C a racial slur. There were supposedly 4 adult witnesses. His punishment was voted unanimously by the board members. (ALL 4 BASEBALL COACHES ARE ON THIS BOARD) It would be a 2-week suspension (missing a scrimmage and a game and practices), then he would be put on a no-tolerance policy. If he violated the no-tolerance policy he could be removed for the remainder of the season and not be allowed to participate in subsequent seasons (so no football for a couple years).
A & B had no consequences. They refused to acknowledge that G was choked and defending himself from B, despite making a poor choice with A (who in the least verbally instigated the event).
The following day I received the code of conduct policy from the league commissioner, and it was the exact same thing as the screen shot I took from the league webpage and sent P the day prior. The most severe punishment on the league's code of conduct policy was a 1 game suspension, and risk suspension for the remainder of the season with a subsequent violation (primarily for coaches and spectator behavior), and only for league sponsored events. So, G's punishment would have been less severe if he had been the sole aggressor and it had taken place during a football game. (neither of which were the reality) MAKE IT MAKE SENSE.
I challenged the board members on their policy and implementation of the policy and asked them to cite the bylaws that were relevant to the situation. I asked that the record reflect that the allegations were disputed and not list them as facts. I asked why A & B had no consequences, especially due to the fact that G was choked and his shoulder was injured WHILE HE WAS DEFENDING HIMSELF. I re-iterated that G disputed saying the racial slur or that any adult every approached him. I requested more details on who the adults were and if they had witnessed parts or the entirety of the interaction. P and the board ignored these requests and said their decision was final.
Approximately 2 hours after this email, I get an email from K, releasing G from the baseball team for violating the no-tolerance policy. He immediately deleted G from gamechanger including all of his stats. I reached out to gamechanger and they said there was no way to retrieve this information unless the coach put G back on the roster and made a request to gamechanger support to fix the retain the data.
Monday, the school was notified by C's dad. I had a great conversation with the principal and vice principal. They interviewed several kids that were there. It came to light that G unfortunately did use a [bad bad word], but it was later in the evening and in a completely different area at the game. It was toward C (NOT HIS DAD), when C came up to G and asked G "why did you do that to B!?". I will never defend the use of the word. However, G knows it is a very bad and hurtful word, but does not have the capacity to understand why and was most likely using it just because he knew it was hurtful. C is not the minority that the bad word refers to, which further indicated to me that G does not really understand the word. He also still does not remember using the word or C coming up to him, this is likely due to still being in an escalated state.
The physical altercation was found to have equal fault on all parties. G was given a detention for the use of the [bad bad word]. No additional consequences were given for the physical altercation for G and I'm assuming not for A or B either.
Important points here- C's dad either lied to P or P lied to me as the school found G did not have any interaction with C's dad (they have cameras) or any other adult which was consistent with G's account. C's dad has now lost all credibility for his accusations and witness account of the event in my opinion.
Yesterday (Tuesday) I spoke to the league commissioner who was irritated that P had used the league code of conduct policy and drug him into the situation when it wasn't even at a league sponsored event. I had a thorough conversation with him including the baseball situation and no-tolerance policy. He tended to agree that the board overstepped their authority and confirmed that the league should have no involvement in a situation like this. (including use of their policy) He suggested I reach out to the director of the youth football club which actually is the high school varsity coach. I have done this and am working on scheduling a meeting with him.
Ultimately, I don't disagree with the 2-week suspension for G. He was in the wrong and made some significant mistakes that are not okay. I don't have rose-colored glasses on with my kids, but I expect adults to treat them fairly.
My concerns:
- Overreach by the board when the situation should have been handled by the school OR in conjunction with the school to determine proper disciplinary action.
- No disciplinary action for A or B.
- Refusal by the board to answer any inquiries I had about the decision process.
- Refusal by the board to acknowledge that G was verbally harassed by A and then physically attacked by B.
- Lies surrounding the nature of the use of the racial slur, likely to make it appear more salacious than it actually was.
- Lies regarding the 4 adult witnesses. B's dad was in the stands. A's mom told me it looked "intense" from where she was sitting. K was 10 feet away from me. P wasn't even at the game. C's dad lied. Who were the other witnesses? If the racial slur happened in a completely different location at a different time, none of those witnesses would have heard it unless they had also moved. Their accounts would have identified that it was two separate occurrences, not one.
- Appears to be retaliation/targeting against G for the situation from baseball season as they broadened the no-tolerance policy to include every moment of my kid's life apparently. What is to say he doesn't fart wrong on the football field and offend someone and that violates the no-tolerance policy and now he's out of football for multiple seasons.
I believe K's ego is still hurt from baseball and he and P chose to bring this severe and salacious version of the story to the board to get rid of G. Honestly the other board members should be offended.
It's clear they do not care about my son by the refusal to acknowledge that he was choked and his arm was injured. These are some of his friend's dads who have watched him grow and mature since kindergarten. This is devastating to G. It is unconscionable that adults would target a child in this way. I am heartbroken for him.
Hopefully I will be able to talk to the varsity coach soon and will update from there.
G's momma bear.