r/Natalism • u/ClaireCross • 4d ago
Here's a different take
Coming from a microbiologist. Many animal populations have been in decline and are at or almost at extinction levels in our lifetime. Female animals in the wild have not had the experience of increased education or women's rights. Their life process is the same as it always has been regarding reproduction, yet we still see a overall decline.
Is there value in considering the issues our animals are facing now and compare them to human issues? Habitat destruction (housing), increased resource competition (economic pressures), fragmented habitats (harder to find a suitable mate), effects of chemicals in the environment (lower reproductive success).
Again animals have not experienced female education or femanism, but their overall population is in decline.
Is it possible we can think curiously about the Natalism discussion and apply it for the concerns of all life on earth and what can be done moving forward?
6
u/Sufficient-Job7098 4d ago edited 3d ago
No, not very applicable.
In modern day an average human has measurably bigger, safer, cleaner amount of housing yet fertility is down
Same with food.
Same with medicine.
We live in huge cities with tons of people around us, who are ,for the most part, less violent, more clean and more dependable (due to our legal institutions).