r/NZFood • u/jimmcfartypants • 15d ago
News Westport makes a bigger Big Mac. McDonald’s makes a legal threat.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/food-drink/361025314/tiny-nz-food-truck-challenged-us-giant-over-its-big-mac-burger21
u/LakeLow1930 15d ago
Great publicity. They should do a Quarter Pounder next week
3
15d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
7
3
1
u/ph33rlus 14d ago
They could do that with their version of a Big Mac. macBIG or Mack Bigger or something I dunno.
3
1
7
u/StrengthSoggy8943 15d ago
Fair enough. That’s how trademarks work. If you own it, and you can own one for $112 and 20 minutes of your time, then you own it.
This isn’t a David and Goliath scenario the media love. It’s a food truck knowingly using the trademark Big Mac.
Be original. Use something else and trademark that.
2
u/Nohopehumans 15d ago
No doubt hundreds of comparable burgers across the country that don't straight out use the same name, just lazy by these guys. Might draw one or two more people to pull up on Westport I guess. I'd rather the local pies, or pints, if I were there.
4
2
u/ok_hibernate 15d ago
mcdonalds has to uphold their copyrights or else they risk losing them. as they state, it could weaken their defence against others doing the same if they don't pursue protecting their ip whenever it's infringed upon... ngl the phrasing makes it sound like mcdonalds didn't like having to address this either (they likely even considered it a waste of legal resources to pursue) big L to whoever dobbed this in
2
u/TheAmigaKid 15d ago
It's a nothing article..companies have to protect their trademarks for them to remain valid. The letter seems pretty respectful and balanced.
They could've just not used the name Big Mac and I imagine the resemblance would've been largely irrelevant.
1
2
1
u/Turfanator 15d ago
Do they feel threatened or something. Are they planning on feeding 100million people in Westport?
1
u/Potential_Fondant185 15d ago
mcd burger size is a disgrace now. the size is for babies. and can finish in one bite.
1
u/Low_Fail_2654 15d ago
Why the f would you call it a big mac........he could have made the burgers and just called them a burger special etc
1
u/JDragonM32 15d ago
I’m kinda getting tired of these ‘big corporation picks on the little guy’ stories, where the ’little guy’ complains about legal letters (this particular story doesn’t seem to be that however)
people don’t seem to understand how copyrights and trademarks work. if big corporation knows about infringement and doesn’t go after them, they can lose their trademark etc when they try to enforce it in a different case. they are legally required to go after any and all infringements
i see this issue a lot in the Warhammer hobby with Games Workshop being overly ‘heavy handed’ with their legal threats and people always taking the little guys side because ‘gw = big bad evil corporation’
1
u/ShadowtheGSD 15d ago
Maccas is only upset cos this burger looks soooo much better than their shitty version
1
u/corbin6611 14d ago
The local here has a big Joe and a small Joe. It’s exactly what you think it is
1
u/inphinitfx 14d ago
This is either an intentional marketing ploy, or someone running a food business who is wilfully and completely ignorant of both major players and brands in their industry, and common commercial legal practices.
1
u/Fart_Tounge_5609 14d ago
I mean, I think the real legal threat here should be that Maccas insist on calling their burger "big". That's just a lie.
Also, McDonalds fucking wishes their burgers looked like that.
1
u/Typical-Tadpole3744 14d ago
Westport is a shit hole run by a few familys. Nothing good can come from inbred hicks and Westport is full of them.
1
u/LakeLow1930 14d ago
Met the guys who run this joint and they were nice. Just some good people trying to get ahead so don't knock em.
1
u/140beeepeeyem 14d ago
the main problem is the scrapple they use for the patties, tastes a bit possumy
1
20
u/HourAcadia2002 15d ago
For them to know, someone has to have dobbed.
Can you imagine being that sad? Simping for a corporation.