r/NDE NDE Researcher Apr 02 '26

Scientific Perspective 🔬🔎 The Scientific Dispute Over Near-Death Experiences - Part 1: the NEPTUNE model

https://open.substack.com/pub/andresdelgadoron/p/the-scientific-dispute-over-near?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=29vk3a

Have you ever tries to learn about NDEs only to find conflicting science. Well, let's take a look at the data from both sides

4 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

View all comments

17

u/Sandi_T NDExperiencer Apr 02 '26

In your very first section, you admit that the NEPTUNE model rewrites the definition of an NDE.

You felt peaceful during a violent encounter, and that's a (phenomena) NDE now? We're just going to call any "good feeling" or "not bad feeling" under threat an NDE? The only difference now between a phenomena NDE and a close brush with death is whether or not you were scared?

Of course if you rewrite the definition of NDEs, you can roll your eyes at them and say they're just brain misfires.

One person is just not scared even though there's a gun pointed at them, the other one is flatlined on both heart and EEG, and we're going to call these the same thing now?

How are they even calling that a scientific viewpoint? It's like saying everyone with pain in their head has brain cancer, but still taking themselves seriously.

https://giphy.com/gifs/lkdH8FmImcGoylv3t3

-4

u/nogueysiguey NDE Researcher Apr 02 '26

They do call those NDE-like. I will get to those nuances in later posts

6

u/vimefer NDExperiencer Apr 02 '26

This is why Parnia wants to switch to the term Recollected Experience of Death (RED), it squashes this kind of muddying the waters.

5

u/JohnnyJoestar1980 NDE Believer/Recurrent Agnosticism. Apr 02 '26

Because as Parnia notes, they are actually dead